Quantcast
Amazing Crysis 2 images. Simply amazing.

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Amazing Crysis 2 images. Simply amazing.

CGI-Quality said:
selnor said:
CGI-Quality said:

Looking at Crysis 2 (at least the console footage) it's not impressing me quite like the original did, in fact, not even close. That said, it DOES look good, nothing short of it.

To the Rage vs KZ3/Crysis 2 talk, I still think Killzone 3 may have the edge when all is said and done. From what I've seen of all of them, I think KZ3 still edges out the win, but Rage looks fantastic and Crysis 2 is right behind it. Rage will likely top them both with textures, Crysis 2 will probably top the others with colors, but Killzone 3 will have the overall prowess to pull off the win, I think. Of course it's exclusivity will play a major role, but it is what it is.

Crysis 2 and Rage will win on massive environments. All the previews as well say a enemy appeared before the end of the 20 min demo of Rage that was about the same size as the big ones from GOW3. 0.0

Worth noting to is Crysis 2's full destruction. Again worth noting is that Rage is running double the framerate of both Crysis 2 and Killzone 3. 

None of the above games have as high a enemy count as Halo Reach, but KZ3 only impressed me for the water. And it was beautiful water. But the rest was very good. Just not Rage or Crysis 2 good.

Also worth noting is Crysis 2 is the only game of the above doing everything in full realtime. 

Well from what I've seen around the net, the buzz is mainly on KZ3. Time will tell which will look better, even though none of it will matter in the long run but otherwise, all is speculation/opinion/perspective.

You do short change KZ3 though.

I'm not short changing KZ3. The water is the most impressive upgrade to KZ2. 

It's also worth remembering technically, that Crysis 2 and Rage are sandbox environments. KZ3 is not. And you have to say Rage is so impressive with double the framerate over both Crysis 2 and KZ3.

With the media. I'm finding Rage is getting the most praise. And aparantly at the end of the 20 minute behind closed doors Rage demo was an enemy likened to the size of GOW3 enemies. Now with those visuals that is possible the most advanced tech Ive ever heard of in a game. It certainly dropped the jaws of gaming sites from what Ive read.



Around the Network
selnor said:
leo-j said:

killzone 3 was showing far more scale than anything shown off with CRYSIS 2 at e3.. and RAGE truely surpasses both.. from what I saw, I am not even joking

RAGE has far more scale than Crysis 2, and far more detail

Are you joking????????????????

KZ3 showed small areas. And a couple of onscreen enemies. Still very enclosed. Combat is tight to you. 

Rage was nice. Definately up there. Reach had much bigger environments, fog effects and draw distance. And the amount of enemies on the ground and sky was awesome. 

Crysis 2 just has the 'whole' package. 

KZ3 so called destruction looked very weak next to Crysis 2 at E3.

a icy mountain is not small in scale O_o what u were watching? it was open area space. with sun burst affecting ur vision with uncharted 2 like snow.



after watching all again i can easily say Crysis 2 is the most dissapointing one of all three.Especially when you factor in how beautiful crysis 1 in junggle setting was.

 

Crysis 2 is a conduit clone now.

 

most beautiful games were Kz3 and Rage.

 

Crysis looks to be a generic boring game.

 

Hope i m wrong.



 

 

 

when people say the ps3 version of crysis 2 is better then the xbox version selnor will start saying a new game is the graphics king just like he did with rage



Why ppl keep falling to Selnor's "Best graphics ever!" crap is beyond me...

How many time have we seen him hype x game up to have the GODLY graphics? wake?540p? Lost planet2?till went multi?Risen? seriously....ignore him, you gotta remember any game as long as it's not PS3 exclusive is "Teh best looking game" to this dude.

Now back to what I said KZ3,Rage,Crysis 2 is on PS3 what's with all the argument? PS3 owners can get them all.



Around the Network
selnor said:
CGI-Quality said:
selnor said:
CGI-Quality said:

Looking at Crysis 2 (at least the console footage) it's not impressing me quite like the original did, in fact, not even close. That said, it DOES look good, nothing short of it.

To the Rage vs KZ3/Crysis 2 talk, I still think Killzone 3 may have the edge when all is said and done. From what I've seen of all of them, I think KZ3 still edges out the win, but Rage looks fantastic and Crysis 2 is right behind it. Rage will likely top them both with textures, Crysis 2 will probably top the others with colors, but Killzone 3 will have the overall prowess to pull off the win, I think. Of course it's exclusivity will play a major role, but it is what it is.

Crysis 2 and Rage will win on massive environments. All the previews as well say a enemy appeared before the end of the 20 min demo of Rage that was about the same size as the big ones from GOW3. 0.0

Worth noting to is Crysis 2's full destruction. Again worth noting is that Rage is running double the framerate of both Crysis 2 and Killzone 3. 

None of the above games have as high a enemy count as Halo Reach, but KZ3 only impressed me for the water. And it was beautiful water. But the rest was very good. Just not Rage or Crysis 2 good.

Also worth noting is Crysis 2 is the only game of the above doing everything in full realtime. 

Well from what I've seen around the net, the buzz is mainly on KZ3. Time will tell which will look better, even though none of it will matter in the long run but otherwise, all is speculation/opinion/perspective.

You do short change KZ3 though.

I'm not short changing KZ3. The water is the most impressive upgrade to KZ2. 

It's also worth remembering technically, that Crysis 2 and Rage are sandbox environments. KZ3 is not. And you have to say Rage is so impressive with double the framerate over both Crysis 2 and KZ3.

With the media. I'm finding Rage is getting the most praise. And aparantly at the end of the 20 minute behind closed doors Rage demo was an enemy likened to the size of GOW3 enemies. Now with those visuals that is possible the most advanced tech Ive ever heard of in a game. It certainly dropped the jaws of gaming sites from what Ive read.

There are far more impressive upgrades to the engine than that. Some wuick research will provide that knowledge to you. In the grand shceme of it all, you have short changed it. Not a big deal, just an observation.

Again, it's all about perspective. Read the article 1up posted.1up says Rage and Crysis 2 look fantastic, but say that KZ3 tops them both. Other websites are saying something similar.

It's just an opinion though, nothing to get bent out of shape over.



                                                                                                                                            

Gee, this thread still going on? All the games, Rage, Crysis 2, Bulletstorm are cross-platform, so any PS3 owner can get them along with Uncharted 2 and Killzone 3

Any exclusive games that can argue about, maybe Kinectimals with the best spooky smiling tiger ever?



Rage looks even better on PS3, but KZ3 still tops it.



SmoothCriminal said:

I'll wait and see how it runs on my PC before I get excited. I've got a kick-ass rig, but I'm afraid that Crysis 2 might just put it to shame, something that no game has been able to do yet.

Then you have no need to worry. Crytek confirmed Crysis 2 will have lower system requirements than Crysis and Warhead.

Not because it's less of a graphical powerhouse but because it takes place in a much easier to render setting. Vegetation is a bitch.



Xoj said:
selnor said:
leo-j said:

killzone 3 was showing far more scale than anything shown off with CRYSIS 2 at e3.. and RAGE truely surpasses both.. from what I saw, I am not even joking

RAGE has far more scale than Crysis 2, and far more detail

Are you joking????????????????

KZ3 showed small areas. And a couple of onscreen enemies. Still very enclosed. Combat is tight to you. 

Rage was nice. Definately up there. Reach had much bigger environments, fog effects and draw distance. And the amount of enemies on the ground and sky was awesome. 

Crysis 2 just has the 'whole' package. 

KZ3 so called destruction looked very weak next to Crysis 2 at E3.

a icy mountain is not small in scale O_o what u were watching? it was open area space. with sun burst affecting ur vision with uncharted 2 like snow.

It's not a playable area.