By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales Discussion - What will sell better PS Move or MS kinect

 

What will sell better PS Move or MS kinect

Ps Move 796 66.28%
 
MS Kinect 405 33.72%
 
Total:1,201
joeorc on 17 June 2010
jneul said:

guys when you vote don't forget about the new coke-cola promo with the move, everyone is going to see the move advertised as we all love coke-cola:):)


well they cannot do that that would help out Sony...lol

remember : it's better is if Sony was not in Gaming at all./:P

Better yet Sony should do a Sega and put all of their 1st party game's on Microsoft's and Nintendo's hardware.because that's the only good place for Sony anyway..the way of SEGA.:p



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.

Around the Network
MARCUSDJACKSON on 17 June 2010

move but it's still to early to tell. im getting move. i can see fantasy action rpg's being done on Kinect. magic type stuff.



 Zarx's unofficial The Witcher 3    

Official Playstation Vita Thread!

write reveiws, articles, share thoughts, and expand on discussion like never before on gamewise.co/brainwaves

jneul on 17 June 2010
joeorc said:
jneul said:

guys when you vote don't forget about the new coke-cola promo with the move, everyone is going to see the move advertised as we all love coke-cola:):)


well they cannot do that that would help out Sony...lol

remember : it's better is if Sony was not in Gaming at all./:P

Better yet Sony should do a Sega and put all of their 1st party game's on Microsoft's and Nintendo's hardware.because that's the only good place for Sony anyway..the way of SEGA.:p


lolz they shall not have their wicked way.

seriously i don't know why they want this to happen it was bad enough when sega left, competition is good for the industry:P:P



it's the future of handheld

PS VITA = LIFE

The official Vita thread http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=130023&page=1

Kantor on 17 June 2010

Kinect, but only because Microsoft is willing to spend millions on advertising and to buy several celebrity endorsements and a ten minute slot on the Jimmy Kimmel show.

Without that enormous advantage, I would say they'd be pretty much equal- perhaps Move would sell slightly better, because the PS3 is selling faster, and the price of entry is lower.



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

joeorc on 17 June 2010
jneul said:
joeorc said:
jneul said:

guys when you vote don't forget about the new coke-cola promo with the move, everyone is going to see the move advertised as we all love coke-cola:):)


well they cannot do that that would help out Sony...lol

remember : it's better is if Sony was not in Gaming at all./:P

Better yet Sony should do a Sega and put all of their 1st party game's on Microsoft's and Nintendo's hardware.because that's the only good place for Sony anyway..the way of SEGA.:p


lolz they shall not have their wicked way.

seriously i don't know why they want this to happen it was bad enough when sega left, competition is good for the industry:P:P

no they want competition just not with Sony being in there.



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.

Around the Network
Kantor on 17 June 2010
kowenicki said:
Zlejedi said:

Move

it has lower entry price (especially with all the cameras that were slipped into people house with EoJ and Eyepet)

it has wider appeal to both casuals and core gamers

it will be on the market 6 weeks earlier


Those two games have sold less than 1m combined....  hardly large penetration.  (even though i am one of those with eyepet)

Also the VAST majority of core gamers will stick to the classic controller for existing and new titles - killzone3 for instance -  where there is an option... I have no doubt about that.

Considering the lack of Kinect support in the vast majority of Microsoft's core first party games, I don't really see that as a point against Move here.



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

joeorc on 17 June 2010
Kantor said:
kowenicki said:
Zlejedi said:

Move

it has lower entry price (especially with all the cameras that were slipped into people house with EoJ and Eyepet)

it has wider appeal to both casuals and core gamers

it will be on the market 6 weeks earlier


Those two games have sold less than 1m combined....  hardly large penetration.  (even though i am one of those with eyepet)

Also the VAST majority of core gamers will stick to the classic controller for existing and new titles - killzone3 for instance -  where there is an option... I have no doubt about that.

Considering the lack of Kinect support in the vast majority of Microsoft's core first party games, I don't really see that as a point against Move here.

what are you talking about it's always a negative point against anything Sony...

esp. on this forum



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.

lolage on 17 June 2010

I think that due to the eye cams out there, the first weeks might get very good sales, that they will diminuish



witorit92 on 17 June 2010

i would have to say kinect but never know tho with the rise of the ps3 going and eveything



nanarchy on 17 June 2010

I am not sure about either, but I voted for kinect as it is significantly cheaper than move. paying for 2-4 move controllers vs 1 kinect controller seems a no brainer in favour of kinect with move likely costing double that of kinect.