This. All we've seen for LA Noire is a few photos.

As for Agent I think that's one that will stay PS3 exclusive because I'm pretty sure Sony has a deal with Rockstar for this game.

Agent will remain PS3 exclusive.

Sony funded L.A Noire up to a point.

Instead of Sony going back for their money, they had a meeting with Take-two and Rockstar and that's where Agent was suggested, and a deal was signed.

Quote me, Agent will remain a PS3 exclusive.

Find it interesting that apparently the $20 million that Sony paid Team Bondi for LA Noire is inherently more valuable than the $50 million that MS paid RockStar for the GTA IV expansions exclusivity.

Why does $20 million = exclusive forever and $50 million = exclusive for 1 year only?

Hope It Does Stay Exclusive, Though i dont think it will. Money Talks, and MS has more money.

if it does stay Exclusive i hope RockStar takes full Advantage of the 60GB Blu-ray Disc and Cell.

GTA is Rockstars biggest franchise.

Yeah that's true - though I can only speculate the details of this contract are like many others in which, have many clauses and options to either continue paying for exclusivity based on the investor's projected sales margins or the publisher is free to release it on rival platforms.  I think $20 million for a Rockstar exclusive for life is very generous. 

Sony owns those IPs. Mass Effect and Gears, and "all 3rd party 360 exclusives"? Microsoft has nothing. Nice try

Who cares? Honostly the console exclusive dickthump-fest is sad and tired. As an owner of all the major platforms I care jackshit about the exclusive nature of a title with the exception of new and fresh gameplay mechanices. I see those on Wii and PC all the time. As far as 360 or PS3 they are roughly equal, and as far as I'm concerned exclusives just limit the audience. I would love to see Halo on PS3, and God of War on 360. Now I know it won't happen, but I think it is bizarre to wish a game not to grace as many consoles as is feasible. Of course I realize that exclusives are inherent to the 1st party structure, but that deosn't mean I don't think it sucks. And yes I don't think multi-plats should be dumbed down. If you can get better graphics or AI on PC, PC3 or 360 be my guest. Non-exclusive doesn't mean that care shouldn't be given to each platform. But the artificial restrictions are silly, and not feasible for 3rd parties- this is pretty clear by the lack of these titles this gen.

I for one would love to see what Alan Wake would look like with the extra beef of the PC or (to a lesser extent) the PS3. By the same token I'm sure many a 360 fan would love to take a stroll in Siren, or Heavy Rain. For that matter imagine Super Mario Galaxy 2 with Move or Natal. Won't happened, but I would love it!

My point is that exclusives only provide ammo for the fanchildren, and are a pain in the ass to the mature, non single console obsessed gamers among us. 

And... You're wrong because Sony owns the Ratchet and Clank and Resistance IPs whereas M$ doesn't own the Gears or Mass Effect IPs.

Well they invested ~$20M into LA Noire and after a few years they had nothing to show to Sony. They are getting a brand new IP as an exclusive and I am sure they are also funding it as well on top of the ~$20M they already spent.

Seems like a fair deal.