By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - What is your take on creationism/creationists?


jckid said:

This is so funny because today i was overhearing a discussion I was having with someone about the Bible, an atheist man (Joe) abruptly interrupted us (with a firm and skeptical tone of voice) asking, "Who wrote the Bible?"  Apparently the topic of God had aroused his curiosity (or hit a nerve!).  The answer to his pressing question was a quick and simple, "God wrote the Bible Joe."  That answer logically prompted him to his next pressing question, "Who is God?"  I tried to explain to him that Jesus Christ is God, that God is the Creator, that God keeps us breathing, and that God is beyond man's finite understanding.  The man asks again, "but who is God?"  I explain that God is God, and we see Him in creation and the Word of God.  Joe again asks, "but who wrote the Bible?"  God did Joe!  Joe repeats the question, "but Who is God?"  We go in circles.  In frustration I succumb to his paramount question: who is God?   Where does God come from?  Where is God?

To my surprise, the gentleman I had been speaking with (Dale, who's just been saved for a short time) speaks up and asks, "Who made that desk your sitting by Joe?"  Joe admits that he has no idea.  "But you can't deny that someone made it because it's in front of your face, right Joe?"  Joe is perplexed.  Dale proceeds to explain to Joe that just because we don't know "Who" God is doesn't mean that He doesn't exist.  God's creation is all around us, and we ourselves are God's creations as well.  Just as we may NOT know the name or history of the person who designed our home, crafted our watch or manufactured our automobile; we surely do NOT know as much about God as we wish we could all know.  But we DO know that these people exist, because of their works.  Likewise, God is revealed by His works of creation (Psalm 19:1-3).  The Bible has much to say about God, revealing His holiness and demand for justice, as well as His love and offer of forgiveness to humanity.  Jesus Christ is God's provision, the Lamb of God, Who shed His blood upon the cruel cross that we might be saved from the death and hell which our own wicked sins have brought upon us. 

Yes, Joe!, God is real, even though you may NOT know Who He is.  Who is God?  Apart from the Bible's teachings about God, I cannot tell you.  I can tell you that Jesus is God, but I cannot physically take you to Him.  I CAN tell you that God lives in my heart, but I cannot prove that to you apart from my changed life.  I can attest that history perfectly substantiates the Bible, but I cannot make you study history.  Not one archeologist has ever dug up so much as one spade full of dirt to disprove God's Word.  Scientifically, the Bible is accurate.  While the Bible was accurately declaring that the earth was round (Isaiah 40:22), people were being executed for teaching that the world was NOT flat.  I double-dog dare you Joe to disprove the Bible!  Joe replies, "Can you prove the Bible is true?"  Study history Joe!  When you study history, you are studying His-Story!  God's story!  There is NOT one PROOF of evolution, but archeology and science have produced an overwhelming amount of proof that the Bible is more than a mere religious document written by men.  The Bible is mysterious, supernatural and abundant in detail.  I challenge you to disprove it! 

What is proof?  Is there really any PROOF of anything?  You can show me a bunch of evidence, but it's my decision whether or not I want to accept it as evidence.  Based upon the SAME evidence, one person may see it as PROOF, whereas another would NOT.  What may be proof to me may not be proof to you.  I behold nature and see it as solid proof of God's existence, goodness and handiwork (Romans 1:20).  Einstein saw this as well.  Perhaps you don't see nature as evidence of God.  But the paramount question still remains, where did all this come from?  If it evolved from stardust, then why do we still live amongst single one-cell life forms (not politicians).  Why do humans have such high intelligence, but animals do not.  Why do humans have a conscience, guilt and morals which animals do not have?  Where did the moral conscience separate from the species?  The answers don't exist!  Humans are humans and animals are animals (1st Corinthians 15:39).  No wonder the Bible speaks of false science (1st Timothy 6:20).  Why false?  Simply because "science" means "to study."  There is NOTHING to study about evolution!  Evolution is NOT testable, repeatable or observable.  If evolution were true, there should be millions of proofs of it.  There is not even one!

Just as that desk, creation exists.  Just as that desk absolutely had to have a designer, so does creation.  There is a specific design in the universe.  The solar system is a perfectly balanced sphere.  Each of the planets exert gravity upon one another, the larger planets exert more gravity than the smaller.  They all rotate around the sun.  They all rotate in their own designated orbit.  Do you really foolishly believe that all this just happened?  If you do, you are not being reasonable.  Do you really believe that the human body just "evolved?"  Do you really believe that music just happened one day?  Do you really believe that all the religions in the world are just mass delirium?  Could it be that perhaps man's need for God is His proof?  Do you believe that love just happened?  Do you believe that sin evolved?  Where did this all come from? 

Who is God?  When Moses was asked by God to deliver the Israelites from bondage in Egypt, Moses didn't think the Israelites would listen to him.  Moses asks God what to say to the Israelites.  Here is what God said...

"And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you." -Exodus 3:14

Who is God?  God IS!  God is God!  God says that His name is I AM.  I can only tell you friend that God IS!  I cannot speak of things which I do not understand.  No one can PROVE to you that God exists, you must look at the visible evidence for yourself.

"For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:" -Romans 1:20

We are all without excuse friend if we do not acknowledge God.  We need to become thankful with a sincere heart of gratitude towards God.  Don't be the fool like Joe who believes that the desk just fell out of the sky from nowhere.  Dale is right, someone made that desk.  You don't know his name, but you know the builder exists.  Likewise, I see creation.  I know it didn't just blowup into existence.  Someone designed and made creation..  The ONLY logical answer is God!

Bruce

 


The first problem is that you seem to equate belief with proof and evidence.  You state in once sentence that there is much PROOF that the Bible is more than a mere religious document, yet a sentence later say that evidence doesn't matter and proof is subjective.  I'm sorry but you don't get to decide what accounts as evidence or proof, that is dictated by logic.   Of course you can decide what you choose to believe, but that is quite a different thing.

You use the example of the desk to show us that even though we can't see the man who made it, we can infer he existed through the evidence of his work and yet you dismiss the same evidence when applied to evolution.  We may not be able to see or even understand the entire process of evolution as it occured/s  but we can at least infer it's existance through the resultant product.  This is immaterial though because we can more than infer the existance of evolution

To say evolution doesn't exist, can't be observed or is untestable is simply an incorrect fact.  There are many simple examples of evolution by natural selection observed within our lifetime (development of antibiotic resistance for example) and while I can understand some people's scepticism in applying these processes the the evolution of the human species from single celled organisms, they ARE examples of evolution. By analogy, let's say we actually see a carpenter make a bed with hammer and nails and witness the process by which he secures the pieces of wood together.  We then see the desk also has similar nails to the bed and wood that appears to be secured in the same fashion.  We can't be certain that the unseen carpenter actually used a hammer to make the desk but it does seem likely.

Another point where you are simply choosing to ignore facts to support a point of view is with regards to the Solar System being a perfect sphere, and then inferring that such perfection and order implies a creator.  It just isn't!  Planets aren't spherical, orbits aren't circular, it isn't in perfect balance and Einstein was the one who explained why without realising it before we even had means to measure it accurately. Einstein, admittedly religious, admittedly brilliant still made mistakes based on assumptions of what he believed must be true, yet was luckly enough to see his beliefs disproven within his lifetime.

There are many other points of contention in your post and while it's not my intent to be obstructively cynical  I would ask for you to refrain from claiming God is the only logical answer to unanswered questions when you have chosen to ignore fact and logic in many points of your post.



Around the Network

I refuse to believe that existence of life is due to mere coincidence. Life is just too perfect



RockSmith372 said:
jckid said:

This is so funny because today i was overhearing a discussion I was having with someone about the Bible, an atheist man (Joe) abruptly interrupted us (with a firm and skeptical tone of voice) asking, "Who wrote the Bible?"  Apparently the topic of God had aroused his curiosity (or hit a nerve!).  The answer to his pressing question was a quick and simple, "God wrote the Bible Joe."  That answer logically prompted him to his next pressing question, "Who is God?"  I tried to explain to him that Jesus Christ is God, that God is the Creator, that God keeps us breathing, and that God is beyond man's finite understanding.  The man asks again, "but who is God?"  I explain that God is God, and we see Him in creation and the Word of God.  Joe again asks, "but who wrote the Bible?"  God did Joe!  Joe repeats the question, "but Who is God?"  We go in circles.  In frustration I succumb to his paramount question: who is God?   Where does God come from?  Where is God?

To my surprise, the gentleman I had been speaking with (Dale, who's just been saved for a short time) speaks up and asks, "Who made that desk your sitting by Joe?"  Joe admits that he has no idea.  "But you can't deny that someone made it because it's in front of your face, right Joe?"  Joe is perplexed.  Dale proceeds to explain to Joe that just because we don't know "Who" God is doesn't mean that He doesn't exist.  God's creation is all around us, and we ourselves are God's creations as well.  Just as we may NOT know the name or history of the person who designed our home, crafted our watch or manufactured our automobile; we surely do NOT know as much about God as we wish we could all know.  But we DO know that these people exist, because of their works.  Likewise, God is revealed by His works of creation (Psalm 19:1-3).  The Bible has much to say about God, revealing His holiness and demand for justice, as well as His love and offer of forgiveness to humanity.  Jesus Christ is God's provision, the Lamb of God, Who shed His blood upon the cruel cross that we might be saved from the death and hell which our own wicked sins have brought upon us. 

Yes, Joe!, God is real, even though you may NOT know Who He is.  Who is God?  Apart from the Bible's teachings about God, I cannot tell you.  I can tell you that Jesus is God, but I cannot physically take you to Him.  I CAN tell you that God lives in my heart, but I cannot prove that to you apart from my changed life.  I can attest that history perfectly substantiates the Bible, but I cannot make you study history.  Not one archeologist has ever dug up so much as one spade full of dirt to disprove God's Word.  Scientifically, the Bible is accurate.  While the Bible was accurately declaring that the earth was round (Isaiah 40:22), people were being executed for teaching that the world was NOT flat.  I double-dog dare you Joe to disprove the Bible!  Joe replies, "Can you prove the Bible is true?"  Study history Joe!  When you study history, you are studying His-Story!  God's story!  There is NOT one PROOF of evolution, but archeology and science have produced an overwhelming amount of proof that the Bible is more than a mere religious document written by men.  The Bible is mysterious, supernatural and abundant in detail.  I challenge you to disprove it! 

What is proof?  Is there really any PROOF of anything?  You can show me a bunch of evidence, but it's my decision whether or not I want to accept it as evidence.  Based upon the SAME evidence, one person may see it as PROOF, whereas another would NOT.  What may be proof to me may not be proof to you.  I behold nature and see it as solid proof of God's existence, goodness and handiwork (Romans 1:20).  Einstein saw this as well.  Perhaps you don't see nature as evidence of God.  But the paramount question still remains, where did all this come from?  If it evolved from stardust, then why do we still live amongst single one-cell life forms (not politicians).  Why do humans have such high intelligence, but animals do not.  Why do humans have a conscience, guilt and morals which animals do not have?  Where did the moral conscience separate from the species?  The answers don't exist!  Humans are humans and animals are animals (1st Corinthians 15:39).  No wonder the Bible speaks of false science (1st Timothy 6:20).  Why false?  Simply because "science" means "to study."  There is NOTHING to study about evolution!  Evolution is NOT testable, repeatable or observable.  If evolution were true, there should be millions of proofs of it.  There is not even one!

Just as that desk, creation exists.  Just as that desk absolutely had to have a designer, so does creation.  There is a specific design in the universe.  The solar system is a perfectly balanced sphere.  Each of the planets exert gravity upon one another, the larger planets exert more gravity than the smaller.  They all rotate around the sun.  They all rotate in their own designated orbit.  Do you really foolishly believe that all this just happened?  If you do, you are not being reasonable.  Do you really believe that the human body just "evolved?"  Do you really believe that music just happened one day?  Do you really believe that all the religions in the world are just mass delirium?  Could it be that perhaps man's need for God is His proof?  Do you believe that love just happened?  Do you believe that sin evolved?  Where did this all come from? 

Who is God?  When Moses was asked by God to deliver the Israelites from bondage in Egypt, Moses didn't think the Israelites would listen to him.  Moses asks God what to say to the Israelites.  Here is what God said...

"And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you." -Exodus 3:14

Who is God?  God IS!  God is God!  God says that His name is I AM.  I can only tell you friend that God IS!  I cannot speak of things which I do not understand.  No one can PROVE to you that God exists, you must look at the visible evidence for yourself.

"For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:" -Romans 1:20

We are all without excuse friend if we do not acknowledge God.  We need to become thankful with a sincere heart of gratitude towards God.  Don't be the fool like Joe who believes that the desk just fell out of the sky from nowhere.  Dale is right, someone made that desk.  You don't know his name, but you know the builder exists.  Likewise, I see creation.  I know it didn't just blowup into existence.  Someone designed and made creation..  The ONLY logical answer is God!

Bruce

 


Who are you? Ray Comfort? First of all, your story doesn't prove that your god is the right god. Your logical fallacies state that creation proves God. Does that mean snowflakes are proof of a snowflake making god or sunsets proof of a sunset making god? The reason we know a god didn't make rocks or sunsets is because we have a natural/observable explanation to how rocks are formed and how sunsets works. No scientists believes that nothing created everything. How the universe existed before the Big Bang is a scientific unknown which some fill in as God, and that's not a problem. However, there is a natural/observable explanation to the diversity of life we see on Earth. It's called evolution by natural selection.

For the chair being there, we know that someone made the deskk because WE CAN see desks being built all the time, and even if you never seen a desk being built, you can google and see how desks are made. That strawman argument because one is provable (the desk) while the other one is never proven. We have never seen any occurance that proves the existence of a god. Otherwise, everyone would be believing in the exact same god.

You said that the planets rotate perfectly and that they are round and orbit perfectly. Yes, gravity causes substances to be drawn together. This would result in a perfectly round planet. Gravity explains why the planets orbit around the sun in a circular manner, but not all satellites(planets) rotate perfectly. Pluto did not and is the reason why it's not considered a planet, but gravity of the sun still pulls Pluto along with many other dwarf planets in the solar system.

As for human evolution. Yes, we share a common ancestor with the great apes. There are many transitional forms: Australopithecus afarensis, Homo Neanderthal, Homo Erectus, Homo Habilis, Homo rudolfensis, and many more. We also have transitional forms from the original tetrapods, whale evolution, bird evolution, and almost every species we see today have fossil records of their past, but even if we didn't have such an overwhelming amount of fossils, we could still prove evolution through genetics and anatomy. We see how human chromosomal fusion happened, retroviral DNA in our genome and the great apes, vestigial structures, convergent evolution, observed speciation through lizards, bacteria, flies, birds, etc. There is an large amount of evidence for evolution, but creationists ignore these because it contridicts your bronze aged text.

Though I will agree with you that if there is a god, it would be so complex beyond our understanding. However, saying that God is God or I am that I am is not a good way to persuade someone, and of course your second verse that states that the universe is proof of God is not backed up by observable evidence. It would be just a plausible to say that the universe is proof that the flying spaghetti monster exists, and of course the "without excuse" is there to state that if you don't believe what the Bible says you'll burn in hell forever.

I hope that this clears up some of the lies, misinterpret information, and logical fallacies states in your post. I hope that you will open your eyes and see the evidence and its message. Evolution by natural selection is a fact.

Underlined.@jckid

Actually, ALL of the planets in the solar system do not orbit the sun perfectly, e.g. in a circle, their orbits are elliptical. And also the earth, and all the other planets are not perfect spheres either they're oblate spheroids as they are slightly flatter at the top and bottom than a sphere...



I don't believe in Creationism, but i believe that as long as their ideas don't interfere with my way of living people can believe whatever they want to and i have no right to critizise them for their belief



Reasonable said:
richardhutnik said:
Reasonable said:

 

Everything else up about politics when you force people to live together, and pool resources.  In the case of creationism, you have religious parents who want to raise their kids certain ways, and are forced into the public school system and have their kids taught, for financial reasons.  If you were to get those kids out of the public school system, then you wouldn't see creationism brought in.  Of course, when this is mentioned as an option, the kids of religious parents suddenly become wards of the state in the minds of some people, who then insist that ALL kids must be taught this and that in society.  Yes, there are people who want to know God did it, and want evidence to support this belief.  I guess someone who is a secular and collectivist would then feel insistent there needs to be a war won, and we get rid of all this "fairy tales". 

So, don't let people go off and do their own thing, expect them to subject you to things that violate your own sensibilities.


The problem from my point of view is simple.  Being taught evolution is like being taught 2 2=4 or that the Universe would seem to be billions of years old or that the Earth orbits the sun.  It is correct and should be understood equally as an observable, measurable element of our world.

Evolution is in line with Galileo observing the Earth isn't the centre of the Universe whereas Creationism is merely a response in line with those who would lock up Galileo and enforce continued belief in something that would now appear, with the latest evidence to be false.  Creationism is about denying and ignoring evidence based purely on religious belief.

It doesn't matter what you think here, or even how much close to what you see evolution is to reality.  There is the issue of parential rights on what their kids are taught.  So long as you force kids of religious parents to subject their kids to public schools, you are going to have to want them either not taught evolution, or be able to be taught something that is compatible with their religious beliefs.  If you don't like this, then enable the parents to take their kids out of the school system.  This is about parential rights.  Their kids are not your kids, and you are to have no say in what they are to be taught. 

It is simple, enable them to get out of the system if they don't like evolution, then you don't need to worry about it.  And that is why it is politics.  Again, if you don't like it, you need to propose an alternative ethics system to one based on rights.  Good luck getting that past the body politic here.

Next up comes, "But but... test scores of America, yadda yadda yadda". 

One last response.

This is an age old problem.  The simple fact is that, in the end, unless there is some sort of consistency then standards will fall and if taken to the extreme the society will simply fail... a nice example of social evolution in a sense.

From my perspective, I don't live in America but Europe, and so far I'm happier with our approach to this aspect of edcucation than America's... although there's plenty else I could find fault with too with our methods.

But again, that's because our societies aren't in some mythical 'final' perfect state.  They are in transition as everything is, and in the long run they will either prosper or fail based on how well they adapt to the needs of survivial.

When you take theories connected to evolution in biology, and try to connect them to other areas, you get some conclusions that end up being pretty ugly for the other disciplines you apply them to.  I am NOT saying that you can't, just that eugentics and economic Darwinism (survival of the fitest) were they byproducts of people trying to take the theory of evolution and aplly it elsewhere.

And yes, societies do face issues of needing common standards, or else they will have problems.  Conservatives, or even modern liberals, driven by the need for some form of collectivism in some part of society, will end up agreeing to this.  Of course, when you do this, and say it MUST come from the government, then you are going to have a culture clash that will subject the children of religious parents to beliefs they disagree with, and in other areas, see people who aren't religious be subjected to prayer.  And this clash of culture doesn't show any sign of being resolved with reason either.  There is not set proofs that can be offered to resolve these.

What has worked relatively well is the U.S Constitution, and the ability for people to control who they assemble with or not.  Individuals have a right to do and believe what they want, so long as others aren't harmed.  By letting people go off on their own, you get them out of the system.  Of course, the framework of American society has been taxed by it becoming increasingly multi-cultural.  It is easier to grant freedom when people have a common set of values, than when they aren't in conflict.  Of course, to then support relativism is to end up putting truth in the same realm as dross, and that isn't good.

Yes, it is an age-old problem.  The conflict in America is now growing and tries to have it resolve itself by having things fit into two colors: red or blue.  Of course, white or purple aren't considered options, because that makes things too complicated.



Around the Network
melbye said:

I don't believe in Creationism, but i believe that as long as their ideas don't interfere with my way of living people can believe whatever they want to and i have no right to critizise them for their belief

The problem happens in school systems where parents are put in a situation where they trust to raise their kids the way they want.  People who aren't religions don't understand that faith IS reality for people, and God actually doing stuff isn't just some sort of passing fancy for people, the way that stamp collecting would be for some.  For some people, it is life.  And when you take school systems, then parents expect their kids to be able to be given support by science that God did it.  This is where the creationism in classrooms comes from.  On the other side, you have non-religious folks who think it is utterly daft that people would even question evolution being valid, and feel it would be HARMFUL for America unless kids are taught that.   It is critical that America keep up in math and sciences, so ALL kids MUST be taught evolution, or America is DOOMED.

Now, put these two sets of values together, and then you have a culture clash that is political.  And then there is the third reality where you can't put truth to a vote either.  2 2=4, period (by definition of math it is that).  2 2 doesn't equal Nintendo's Mario (unless Nintendo's Mario is said to be the same as 4).  People see all this and there are no easy answers, no matter how each side wants it to be.



richardhutnik said:
melbye said:

I don't believe in Creationism, but i believe that as long as their ideas don't interfere with my way of living people can believe whatever they want to and i have no right to critizise them for their belief

The problem happens in school systems where parents are put in a situation where they trust to raise their kids the way they want.  People who aren't religions don't understand that faith IS reality for people, and God actually doing stuff isn't just some sort of passing fancy for people, the way that stamp collecting would be for some.  For some people, it is life.  And when you take school systems, then parents expect their kids to be able to be given support by science that God did it.  This is where the creationism in classrooms comes from.  On the other side, you have non-religious folks who think it is utterly daft that people would even question evolution being valid, and feel it would be HARMFUL for America unless kids are taught that.   It is critical that America keep up in math and sciences, so ALL kids MUST be taught evolution, or America is DOOMED.

Now, put these two sets of values together, and then you have a culture clash that is political.  And then there is the third reality where you can't put truth to a vote either.  2 2=4, period (by definition of math it is that).  2 2 doesn't equal Nintendo's Mario (unless Nintendo's Mario is said to be the same as 4).  People see all this and there are no easy answers, no matter how each side wants it to be.

Why is this only a major problem in the States though? In Europe people generally accept religion and science to be 2 seperate subjects, and that they can complement each other. The creationist ideas are taught in religious studies, evolution is taught in science. I was taught the different belief systems of a number of religions but that never interfered with what I was taught in science.



Scoobes said:
richardhutnik said:
melbye said:

I don't believe in Creationism, but i believe that as long as their ideas don't interfere with my way of living people can believe whatever they want to and i have no right to critizise them for their belief

The problem happens in school systems where parents are put in a situation where they trust to raise their kids the way they want.  People who aren't religions don't understand that faith IS reality for people, and God actually doing stuff isn't just some sort of passing fancy for people, the way that stamp collecting would be for some.  For some people, it is life.  And when you take school systems, then parents expect their kids to be able to be given support by science that God did it.  This is where the creationism in classrooms comes from.  On the other side, you have non-religious folks who think it is utterly daft that people would even question evolution being valid, and feel it would be HARMFUL for America unless kids are taught that.   It is critical that America keep up in math and sciences, so ALL kids MUST be taught evolution, or America is DOOMED.

Now, put these two sets of values together, and then you have a culture clash that is political.  And then there is the third reality where you can't put truth to a vote either.  2 2=4, period (by definition of math it is that).  2 2 doesn't equal Nintendo's Mario (unless Nintendo's Mario is said to be the same as 4).  People see all this and there are no easy answers, no matter how each side wants it to be.

Why is this only a major problem in the States though? In Europe people generally accept religion and science to be 2 seperate subjects, and that they can complement each other. The creationist ideas are taught in religious studies, evolution is taught in science. I was taught the different belief systems of a number of religions but that never interfered with what I was taught in science.

Why is it an issue in the United States?  Well, the way the U.S Constitution got interpreted, the First Amendment regarding religion means "separation of church and state".  The state isn't to meddle in how churches work, and churches aren't to meddle in the affairs of the state (except through religious people).  Churches get no financial support from the government, so they do their own thing.  It isn't a "problem", but more like how it is.   Because in America, freedom is held as the top value, it is different than Europe or other nations that have more Socialistic overtones.

In regards to creationism, or even Intelligent Design, this isn't meant to be religion.  It is meant to be science that is agreeable with certain religious values.  And that is a different animal.  And it is meant to appeal to parents who want their kids to believe God did it, and wants science to back it (or at least feel science is backing it).

Anyhow, back to America vs Europe.  Europe seems far more likely to reach common ground in a lot of areas, and develop consensus on what is social norms.  In America, it is everyone do their own thing, and go off on your own and go it alone.  End result of this is you will have less likely to reach consensus, and more likely to have fights for power where people get fully what they want to do, rather than half a loaf.  Because of this, you don't get socialize medicine (the abortion issue figures into this) and laws get passed to outlaw gay marriage also.  People here feel that those with other values are imposing themselves on them, and they can't escape, so they need to fight back.  Of course, the likes of Fox News does feed into all of this.



Ok, I am going to bring in Paley's watch here for a moment.  Paley's watch argument comes up in various forms (ID is based around it), because people have witnessed personally that complex systems that work together too well are engineered.  People see what men do over and over, and then when they see something else that no one who made it is a sign of, the initial belief is that some intelligence engineered what they saw.  The default position is that the item in question is the byproduct of intelligence, and that is the acceptable default position.

Ok, now bring on people who are evolutionists, and particularly non-theists.  Such individuals end up trying to argue with people the default normal view one should take when one runs into complex systems that look like they were engineered, is that they weren't designed, but came about by a mix of unguided deterministic and random changes.  And the changes that remained were the ones that survived a hostile environment and ability to change. 

If you want to know why, among normal people, evolution as THE all encompassing way of life, that doesn't require a intelligent creator isn't accepted as the norm, it is because of this.  The norm for people is that complex systems are engineered, and not the byproduct of unguided forces that are a mix of random and determinism.  We actually have almost no actual lab experiments that fully functioning complex systems that work together aren't engineered.  Even in experiments where there is chaos involved, and computer models, we tend to see that people code the program to run the environment and set parameters.



They are normal and right.