By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Ninja Theory boss: Naughty Dog is “best console developer in the world”

I don't think so. There are numerous excellent developers you can point to with an even bigger track record. Sure you can say they are one of the best in a hardcore gaming sense but they are merely very good relative to the entire scope of gaming when you consider some of the massive mainstream developers as well. Taking just one developer, Blizzard. They have topped the genres of MMORPG, RTS and ARPG. Pretty much everything they have touched has risen to be considered the best and next to that the achievements of Naughty Dog have to be considered a level lower.



Tease.

Around the Network
fps_d0minat0r said:
as much as i like naughtydog and uncharted, nothing can beat Polyphony digital....those guys have enough facilities for the employees to live there.
i dont count nintedo devs because they make their 5gb games in a basement using pentium 3 processors.

SMG2 is 1.6gigs and has an average rating of 98 atm which just released like, a week or 2 ago? as much as I like UC2 and got le plat, Nintendo first party=fucking beast.

 

ps: can't comment on polyphony this gen, they have, no games on my PS3 /shrug



MrBubbles said:
Smashed said:
MrBubbles said:
i dont like a single game they have ever made. my opinion of them is quite low.

So wait a minute.

You think low of them because YOU don't like a single game they made?

Well... that's very un-gamer like.

actually, i think the games are rubbish and therefore think naughty dog is rubbish.  i was just trying to be polite. 


This...is a stupid post. Seriously, dude, you don't even have a PS3, how can you even say something like that?

Get out of here, troll.



Sorry for bad English.

 

Squilliam said:

I don't think so. There are numerous excellent developers you can point to with an even bigger track record. Sure you can say they are one of the best in a hardcore gaming sense but they are merely very good relative to the entire scope of gaming when you consider some of the massive mainstream developers as well. Taking just one developer, Blizzard. They have topped the genres of MMORPG, RTS and ARPG. Pretty much everything they have touched has risen to be considered the best and next to that the achievements of Naughty Dog have to be considered a level lower.


Oh, c'mon, they are giving their own opinions. Can you even respect that?

Yeah, there are more good developers, everyong knows that, but that's not the point.



Sorry for bad English.

 

MrBubbles said:
Smashed said:
MrBubbles said:
i dont like a single game they have ever made. my opinion of them is quite low.

So wait a minute.

You think low of them because YOU don't like a single game they made?

Well... that's very un-gamer like.

actually, i think the games are rubbish and therefore think naughty dog is rubbish.  i was just trying to be polite. 


I can respect that, cause i think the same thing about Valve..



Around the Network
zzamaro said:
Squilliam said:

I don't think so. There are numerous excellent developers you can point to with an even bigger track record. Sure you can say they are one of the best in a hardcore gaming sense but they are merely very good relative to the entire scope of gaming when you consider some of the massive mainstream developers as well. Taking just one developer, Blizzard. They have topped the genres of MMORPG, RTS and ARPG. Pretty much everything they have touched has risen to be considered the best and next to that the achievements of Naughty Dog have to be considered a level lower.


Oh, c'mon, they are giving their own opinions. Can you even respect that?

Yeah, there are more good developers, everyong knows that, but that's not the point.

The opinion was that they are the best console developer. Clearly they are not in a wider sense of the definition because you'd have to consider all console developers for all market segments. However considering only a narrow segment of developers then in that sense they could be considered the best by a few people depending on the subjective criteria.



Tease.

wholikeswood said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:

What, those games were developed by 2nd party developers, right?

I know the Brawl developer(can't think of his name) has been making Nintendo games for years, so while technically they aren't developed by Nintendo.....I still think of them as being developed by Nintendo, lol.

Anyway, yeah, Nintendo is probably the best developer on console imo. Their games might not be absolutely "better" than say Uncharted 2, but there are a lot more of em, hehe.

Not really a fair comparison though...

The number of Nintendo employees must dwarf the number of ND employees, surely?

Not only that, but Nintendo itself is an aggregate of several studios. It'd make much more sense to compare their individual studios to ND or even the whole of Nintendo to the whole of Sony.



They are very good.



CGI-Quality said:
Squilliam said:

The opinion was that they are the best console developer. Clearly they are not in a wider sense of the definition because you'd have to consider all console developers for all market segments. However considering only a narrow segment of developers then in that sense they could be considered the best by a few people depending on the subjective criteria.

That's "clearly" your opinion though, which is what he's trying to explain to you.

Clearly Miyamoto is considered the greatest developer of all time. Since hes still producing work then clearly in a console sense he is head, shoulders, torso, hips, legs and knees and ankles above Naughty Dog.

Clearly...



Tease.

yeah Naughty Dog is also my favorite developing-company...but the best Developer is Hideo IMO...

would love to see a Naughty Gear Solid xD