Quantcast
Bombshell:Patcher reveals David Jaffe's new game before E3!

Forums - Sony Discussion - Bombshell:Patcher reveals David Jaffe's new game before E3!

Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
He just pretty much confirmed the game, and now it won't be considered a surprised at the Sony E3 press conference by anyone in the press, and so Sony loses a point for E3.

If you confirm something before it's officially announced you reduce the impact, fact.

That is why this matters.

I guarantee you that Jaffe is angry about this. Probably very angry.

"loses a point"?  See what you want to see. 

Jaffe has been dropping sufficient hints about TM for everyone to anticipate TM at E3.   Though he may in fact be angry; it was a childish exchange and it would also be extremely childish if anyone, say, who disrespects Jaffe, feels good about the exchange.

Best upcoming lineup shown at E3 still means that company has the best E3.  Good luck in your desire that it not be Sony.

lol, so I see what you did there.

You know that I dislike Jaffe, because of my old sig I assume, which blatantly stated that I disrespected him.

Also, you implied that I'm a Sony foeboy.

However, I don't think you disagreed with anything I've said. It's funny how it's my fault these things happen when I point out the obvious.

You seem more angry that I'm apparently happy about this turn of events, than you are that they happened.

Yes, yes I am happy. Take that Jaffe!! :)



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

Around the Network
BMaker11 said:
"So I think that unfortunately Sony really does have good first party content"

What a bitch

I don't think you know the context in which he made that statement, and you probably should find out before calling him a "bitch" don't you think?



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

Slimebeast said:

Cool. But in the OP article, they used the parentehsis () wrong then. Because Patcher actually said the exact words "...none Move first party content" in the show.

“So I think that unfortunately Sony really does have good first party content, (none Move first party content like [David Jaffe’s Twisted Metal 2 Game),” he said.

Sadly proper usage is not universal. The usage in the article is entirely wrong. I'd guess the place that wrote it originally is third rate as they quote him wrong (none instead of non) and use parenthesis and brackets completely incorrectly, and randomly. No specific offense meant to them, but it is hard to view a new source as credible if it fails to use proper spelling and grammar.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

^thanks for clearing it all up Gnizmo. I was upset for a while there lol.

I learned something new today.



I'm finding all of these pre-E3 bombshells rather odd (especially when it comes to Sony's announcements.)

So far we have...

1. LittleBigPlanet 2
2. KillZone 3
3. Tekken 7
4. InFamous 2
5. Next Twisted Metal

These are all big (huge) titles that would have created a lot of buzz if they were announced during Sony's E3 Conference. *Shrugs* I mean, a title announced is a title announced, and we'll all be playing them regardless, but it just seems rather odd seeing as we have only 2 weeks before E3.



Around the Network

CALYPSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221391&page=1

Are you trying to tell me that Jaffe was lying when he said he wasn't working on a new twisted metal . i am flabbergasted just utterly surprised.



 

ZenfoldorVGI said:
Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
He just pretty much confirmed the game, and now it won't be considered a surprised at the Sony E3 press conference by anyone in the press, and so Sony loses a point for E3.

If you confirm something before it's officially announced you reduce the impact, fact.

That is why this matters.

I guarantee you that Jaffe is angry about this. Probably very angry.

"loses a point"?  See what you want to see. 

Jaffe has been dropping sufficient hints about TM for everyone to anticipate TM at E3.   Though he may in fact be angry; it was a childish exchange and it would also be extremely childish if anyone, say, who disrespects Jaffe, feels good about the exchange.

Best upcoming lineup shown at E3 still means that company has the best E3.  Good luck in your desire that it not be Sony.

lol, so I see what you did there.

You know that I dislike Jaffe, because of my old sig I assume, which blatantly stated that I disrespected him.

Also, you implied that I'm a Sony foeboy.

However, I don't think you disagreed with anything I've said. It's funny how it's my fault these things happen when I point out the obvious.

You seem more angry that I'm apparently happy about this turn of events, than you are that they happened.

Yes, yes I am happy. Take that Jaffe!! :)

You used sleight of hand to dig at Sony and make the point that this diminished how effective their E3 would be, which is patently ludicrous to one not of your predisposition.  It was childish, or should I use the term trolling?

So I wasn't out to contradict you, you see, except to say that you overstated how much this "harmed Sony's E3" or whatever, which is tenuous at best and which you pulled out of thin air even though what news means to most people is simply that there is one more non-confirmatory bit of evidence that a new game from a series they like (TM) is indeed in production.

 



Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
He just pretty much confirmed the game, and now it won't be considered a surprised at the Sony E3 press conference by anyone in the press, and so Sony loses a point for E3.

If you confirm something before it's officially announced you reduce the impact, fact.

That is why this matters.

I guarantee you that Jaffe is angry about this. Probably very angry.

"loses a point"?  See what you want to see. 

Jaffe has been dropping sufficient hints about TM for everyone to anticipate TM at E3.   Though he may in fact be angry; it was a childish exchange and it would also be extremely childish if anyone, say, who disrespects Jaffe, feels good about the exchange.

Best upcoming lineup shown at E3 still means that company has the best E3.  Good luck in your desire that it not be Sony.

lol, so I see what you did there.

You know that I dislike Jaffe, because of my old sig I assume, which blatantly stated that I disrespected him.

Also, you implied that I'm a Sony foeboy.

However, I don't think you disagreed with anything I've said. It's funny how it's my fault these things happen when I point out the obvious.

You seem more angry that I'm apparently happy about this turn of events, than you are that they happened.

Yes, yes I am happy. Take that Jaffe!! :)

You used sleight of hand to dig at Sony and make the point that this diminished how effective their E3 would be, which is patently ludicrous to one not of your predisposition.  It was childish, or should I use the term trolling?

So I wasn't out to contradict you, you see, except to say that you overstated how much this "harmed Sony's E3" or whatever, which is tenuous at best and which you pulled out of thin air even though what news means to most people is simply that there is one more non-confirmatory bit of evidence that a new game from a series they like (TM) is indeed in production.

 

You must be joking. I pointed out the fact that surprises at E3 are better than not surprises when it comes to the way we gamers "keep score." Suddenly I'm trolling? Read my original post. It's very much on point and on topic, and had no implication of a dig towards sony besides stating the opinion that this costs them a point for their E3 press conference(which you can take to mean what you will, but it certainly doesn't cost them nothing, or the internet wouldn't care). You simply saw my name, and read a bunch of shit into it that wasn't there, because you are biased and defensive.

I don't know if I "overstated" the situation. I think that my analogy is pretty valid. This is a "surprise" that won't happen at E3 because it happened at the bonus round. It's not a big surprise, certainly, but it's of note, and I'll be goddamned if I'm going to be bullied out of mentioning this kind of stuff because it makes people like you angry when it's said aloud. Get over it, and stop trying to claim ToS violations like "trolling" if you don't know what the hell it means.

 



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

ZenfoldorVGI said:
Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
 

 

You must be joking. I pointed out the fact that surprises at E3 are better than not surprises when it comes to the way we gamers "keep score." Suddenly I'm trolling? Read my original post. It's very much on point and on topic, and had no implication of a dig towards sony besides stating the opinion that this costs them a point for their E3 press conference(which you can take to mean what you will, but it certainly doesn't cost them nothing, or the internet wouldn't care). You simply saw my name, and read a bunch of shit into it that wasn't there, because you are biased and defensive.

I don't know if I "overstated" the situation. I think that my analogy is pretty valid. This is a "surprise" that won't happen at E3 because it happened at the bonus round. It's not a big surprise, certainly, but it's of note, and I'll be goddamned if I'm going to be bullied out of mentioning this kind of stuff because it makes people like you angry when it's said aloud. Get over it, and stop trying to claim ToS violations like "trolling" if you don't know what the hell it means.

 

Your original post brought in how this was bad for Sony, as a dig pulled out of thin air against Sony, fact.  You're right that it was only a dig in the sense that it was a dig, hah.

Hey you should really tell Sony about your rules of winning E3, because once Sony realizes that surprises are so important to scoring "points" at E3, maybe they'll stop having these pre-E3 reveals in magazines -- of KZ3, Infamous 2, etc!  They are shooting themselves in the foot for E3 b/c according to Folder's rules of E3 they have to have surprises!  I guess they don't care, huh?

The internet was abuzz with the TM news because people are excited about a TM game being in the works and/or because of the bitchy back and forth between Pachter and Jaffe.  A 'reveal' of TM is only a big deal because people want TM PS3 to be coming.  It shows how off-base you are that you claim the internet cared because this is going to cost Sony a point at E3.  I'll be goddamned if I'm not going to mention this to you.