IGN's Lost planet 2 PS3/360 comparison contradicts there review

leo-j

Currently Offline

194,377

25572 posts since 11/06/07

Recent Badges:

The Nuts & Bolts Add a total of 25 games to your collection.
Congratulations on Pressing Start! Score your first game in your collection.
Open For Business Earned 10 badges.
Mirror Image Awarded for uploading an avatar.
God Of VGC 10,000 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
8 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 8 years.

leo-j on 12 May 2010

tuscaniman said:

scottie said:

tuscaniman said:
Why do you guys trust a post by Leo J? In the review it states nothing about the PS3 version looking inferior. It states the PS3 runs worse. It has framerate drops and pauses. Nothing in the review states it is worse. Leo stop trying to make it seem like the world is out against the PS3. I've already commented about you doing this in another thread and you created a thread to try to do it again. If you want to read the review yourself here is the link. http://ps3.ign.com/articles/108/1088085p1.html Second paragraph talks about the 360 and PS3 versions.
P.S. The game got a 6 on the 360 and a 5.5 on the PS3. Why are we even wasting time on this game that obviously is not good.

In what sense are framerate drops NOT a graphics issue? The only two aspect of graphics that I care about are having a solid framerate and decent draw distance

Leo created this thread to make it seem IGN was bias towards the 360 and that they state that asthetically the PS3 graphics are worse than the 360 when they mention nothing about that. They mention framerate. Framerate is a performance issue, not a graphical issue in the sene that Leo tried to make it sound.

The original article came from Gametrailers, and um, sorry if it seems like I am trying to say IGN hates the ps3, because that was never my intention

mM

MARCUSDJACKSON

Currently Offline

62,711

13807 posts since 08/04/10

Recent Badges:

9 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 9 years.
8 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 8 years.
Ride Into the Sunset Managed to avoid being banned for 3 months.
6 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 6 years.
Site Veteran Has been a VGChartz member for over 5 years.
14 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 14 years.

Currently Playing:

Brutal Legend (PS3)
ModNation Racers (PS3)

MARCUSDJACKSON on 12 May 2010

yea. the PS3 version looks more solid.

Zarx's unofficial The Witcher 3

Official Playstation Vita Thread!

write reveiws, articles, share thoughts, and expand on discussion like never before on gamewise.co/brainwaves

Kushalafang

Currently Offline

821

97 posts since 15/01/10

Recent Badges:

6 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 6 years.
10 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 10 years.
The Nuts & Bolts Add a total of 25 games to your collection.
4 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 4 years.
11 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 11 years.
So You Came Back For More, Huh? Logged in a second time.

Currently Playing:

MAG: Massive Action Game (PS3)
BlazBlue: Continuum Shift (PS3)
Final Fantasy Tactics: The War of the Lions (PSP)
Prinny: Can I Really Be the Hero? (PSP)

Kushalafang on 12 May 2010

MARCUSDJACKSON said:
yea. the PS3 version looks more solid.

....no its not you can tell from the video, the PS3 version has no aliasing, has more screen tearing looks like maybe 10% more, and is running sub 20 FPS maybe even lower.

STEKSTAV

Currently Offline

7,534

1042 posts since 23/11/09

Recent Badges:

10 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 10 years.
2 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 2 years.
14 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 14 years.
Open For Business Earned 10 badges.
4 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 4 years.
A Badge Within A Badge Earned 20 badges.

STEKSTAV on 12 May 2010

disolitude said:
Yeah yeah...everything 360 is terrible. PS3 FTW! Lets move on...

Sarcasm?

BAZINGA!

scottie

Currently Offline

34,244

6930 posts since 22/04/08

Recent Badges:

Right Tool for the Right Tool Score a total of 25 games in your collection.
Social Butterfly 50 friends on gamrConnect.
First Rung Of The Ladder Earned 10,000 gamrPoints
So You Came Back For More, Huh? Logged in a second time.
'Ello Princess! Awarded for signing up.
Genocide 5,000 posts on the gamrConnect forums.

Currently Playing:

Metroid: Other M (Wii)
World of Warcraft: Cataclysm (PC)

scottie on 12 May 2010

tuscaniman said:

scottie said:

Barozi said:

scottie said:

Barozi said:

scottie said:

thelifatree said:

Dude give it up you don't know what you're talking about. Framerate issues are more important than graphical fidelity. If you can't play the game it doesn't matter how good it looks therefore framerate outweighs asthetics. If you can prove to me there is someone who would rather play a game that gets 1 frame per second but looks photorealistic over a game that doesn't look as well but runs 30fps then I will apologize and say you are correct. Good luck trying to find that person.

Wow, spectacular. I can provide stupid examples that have nothing to do with the actual topic. graphical fidelity is obviously more important than framerate. If you can prove to me there is someone who would rather play a game that displays in a resolution of 1 pixel by 1 pixel but has a great framerate over a game that doesn't have quite as good a framerate but runs in 1080p then I will apologise and say you are correct. Good luck trying to find that person.

I'm done with this discussion. Ciao

pizzahut451

Banned

2,156

1710 posts since 12/03/10

Recent Badges:

Trust Me, It'll Have Legs 100 replies made to user's most popular thread.
Littlest Genocide 1,000 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
Leaving Limbo 100 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
Watch Your Back! Received 10,000 profile views.
Mirror Image Awarded for uploading an avatar.

pizzahut451 on 13 May 2010

kowenicki said:

pizzahut451 said:

themanwithnoname said:
*yawn* Just another typical BS PS3 conspiracy theory. Have any of you actually played the game? Yeah, that's what I thought. This is no different than the crappy "Edge is biased!" threads we get five times a year.

nobody is talking about the quality of the game. people are talking about incredible bias that is coming from IGN when they give 2 diffrent scores for a game.

on IGN UK they both have a rather crappy 68... identical scores.

on IGN US there is a 5/100 difference (5%)

incredible bias?

Or 0% diffrence on Final Fanatsy 13 score???(except for IGN US, those guys are really biased towards PS3) I hate it how they give sepreate scores for a game only if PS3 version is inferior.

Haste262

Currently Offline

1,251

207 posts since 02/10/09

Recent Badges:

2 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 2 years.
50 in One Add a total of 50 games to your collection.
Mirror Image Awarded for uploading an avatar.
The Nuts & Bolts Add a total of 25 games to your collection.
One Piece at a Time Add your first game to your collection.
11 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 11 years.

Haste262 on 13 May 2010

I believe your more bias than ign will ever be, but there ya go.

Skeeuk

Currently Offline

65,079

8456 posts since 19/02/08

Recent Badges:

It's a Start Bank a Total of 2,000 VG$.
Littlest Genocide 1,000 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
14 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 14 years.
One Small 'Splosion Author of 100 forum threads.
Mighty Heart Logged in on Valentine's Day.
12 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 12 years.

Skeeuk on 13 May 2010

i tried the demo on both and looked and ran the same imo

mabey ps3 version drops frames and 360 version has less sharp visuals, but end of day the game is a massive letdown

...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...