This why 3D gaming with glasses suck.
My regular glasses are these:
Now tell how am I supposed to wear those 3D shutter glasses over this ones.
well, looks like its good timing for all of them.
Oh and lulz @ MS partnering with a Korean company instead of japanese.
“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.
LOL to anyone who thought only PS3 could do it... lol, you know your out there.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, PS3's 3D (as all home 3D at this point) is a huge flop of shit and needs to be skipped by the consumers. The manufacturers need to realize we won't pay $100's for each pair of glasses just to watch 3D at home.
If costs prevent glassless 60" tvs, then at least utilized the passive system theaters use. Worked just fine for Avatar and every other 3D movie and would only cost a few bucks, if that for each pair of glasses. Then I wouldn't mind my 4yr old wearing them or buying 20 for the big sporting events.
superchunk said: LOL to anyone who thought only PS3 could do it... lol, you know your out there. I've said it before and I'll say it again, PS3's 3D (as all home 3D at this point) is a huge flop of shit and needs to be skipped by the consumers. The manufacturers need to realize we won't pay $100's for each pair of glasses just to watch 3D at home. If costs prevent glassless 60" tvs, then at least utilized the passive system theaters use. Worked just fine for Avatar and every other 3D movie and would only cost a few bucks, if that for each pair of glasses. Then I wouldn't mind my 4yr old wearing them or buying 20 for the big sporting events. |
You'd need two projector lenses (or two projectors) each polarized differently for that to work. It'd be more expensive than the current set up even if you included 10 shutter glasses in the price and more importantly, it wouldn't be LCD technology which means big, bulky rear projection or just a projector, which isn't a TV.
megaman79 said: well, looks like its good timing for all of them.
Oh and lulz @ MS partnering with a Korean company instead of japanese. |
You know why?
Because Samsung and LG HD TVs and 3d TVs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sony Bravia TVs
Pretty much when it comes to electronics, Samsung beats Sony any day whether it be laptops, TVs, Phones, etc.
Cross-X said:
You know why? Because Samsung and LG HD TVs and 3d TVs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sony Bravia TVs Pretty much when it comes to electronics, Samsung beats Sony any day whether it be laptops, TVs, Phones, etc.
|
Yeah you keep telling yourself that.
Garnett said: Oh snap Alan Wake 3D? |
at full HD 320x240 :p ehehe