By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Rumour: Xbox Live to get TV Channel, Gold to increase by $1-2 dollars

Mr Puggsly said:
wichdog69 said:
NO! If they raise the cost for live I'll have to get rid of my 360 and get a PS3. I will not pay a dollar more for something that should be free in the first place.

It shouldn't be free. It cost money to run those servers.

Could be worse, people pay $10 - $15 just to play a single MMORPG.

  Somehow Sony manages, somehow steam manages, somehow the iphone/ipod touch manage, somehow the DS manages, somehow the Wii manages....etc etc

 

  It is very clearly possible to not charge for online games and more then cover the costs of an online system with game and movie revenue.  Microsoft doesn't because once they get you locked into a platform they milk you for all you're worth (for other examples see Office costing 500 dollars+ and Windows 7 costing over 300 dollars for a full version).

 

  It should absolutely be free to play the games I PAID for.  The payment for the online services should be included in the 60 dollars I pay for the game just as playing starcraft for years on battlenet was covered by buying starcraft at retail.




 PSN ID: ChosenOne feel free to add me

Around the Network
Impulsivity said:
Mr Puggsly said:
wichdog69 said:
NO! If they raise the cost for live I'll have to get rid of my 360 and get a PS3. I will not pay a dollar more for something that should be free in the first place.

It shouldn't be free. It cost money to run those servers.

Could be worse, people pay $10 - $15 just to play a single MMORPG.

  Somehow Sony manages, somehow steam manages, somehow the iphone/ipod touch manage, somehow the DS manages, somehow the Wii manages....etc etc

 

  It is very clearly possible to not charge for online games and more then cover the costs of an online system with game and movie revenue.  Microsoft doesn't because once they get you locked into a platform they milk you for all you're worth (for other examples see Office costing 500 dollars+ and Windows 7 costing over 300 dollars for a full version).

 

  It should absolutely be free to play the games I PAID for.  The payment for the online services should be included in the 60 dollars I pay for the game just as playing starcraft for years on battlenet was covered by buying starcraft at retail.

Because its generally free means it should always be free?

Sony, Steam, and Nintendo doesn't pay for the servers for every game like Microsoft does (excluding EA games).

Hence, offering online play on the PS3, DS, Wii, and PC becomes another expense for developers/publishers.

 

Also, people don't need the $500 or $300 versions of Windows 7 and Office. Office Home and Student is $150. You could also get Open Office for free. Windows Home Premium is about $100. It basically comes free with new computers as well.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

twesterm said:
They aren't going to raise the price of Live since you can buy it however far you want in advance. If they announced it, just buy a year or two of Live cards and you'll never see the increase.

Correct.  I always hit up those $30 deals.  Got like 3 years worth of Live.  A price hike will affect me none.

 

Also, the cost of Live has actually decreased about 16% since it started, due to inflation.



Mr Puggsly said:
Impulsivity said:

  Somehow Sony manages, somehow steam manages, somehow the iphone/ipod touch manage, somehow the DS manages, somehow the Wii manages....etc etc

 

  It is very clearly possible to not charge for online games and more then cover the costs of an online system with game and movie revenue.  Microsoft doesn't because once they get you locked into a platform they milk you for all you're worth (for other examples see Office costing 500 dollars+ and Windows 7 costing over 300 dollars for a full version).

 

  It should absolutely be free to play the games I PAID for.  The payment for the online services should be included in the 60 dollars I pay for the game just as playing starcraft for years on battlenet was covered by buying starcraft at retail.

Because its generally free means it should always be free?

Sony, Steam, and Nintendo doesn't pay for the servers for every game like Microsoft does (excluding EA games).

Hence, offering online play on the PS3, DS, Wii, and PC becomes another expense for developers/publishers.

 

Also, people don't need the $500 or $300 versions of Windows 7 and Office. Office Home and Student is $150. You could also get Open Office for free. Windows Home Premium is about $100. It basically comes free with new computers as well.

Exactly.

Microsoft heavily favors developers. Sony's service is free, but guess who they charge for bandwidth? Developers. It's not free, someone has to pay for it.

 

As for speaking of playing StarCraft for years... Well, I did too. And I remember server splits. I remember logging on and seeing 3 copies of myself in a channel (but none of my friends, who were in the same channel). I remember trying to join games that would freeze. I remember everyone in my circle of friends attempting to host games, trying to find the one of us everyone could connect to.

Xbox live, you log on, enter a standard matchmaking setup, and a minute later you're in a game. Technology marches forward, everything gets better, and costs rise. If you bargain hunt, what is MS charging for the service... $3? $5 a month for those of us who can't be bothered to save such a small amount of money. It's not exactly price gouging. And Live has enough special features to be worth it



it would be cool to get a channel, i don't have a tv.

as for increasing fees i don't think that would happen.

MS has been constantly adding value to Live without modifying its' price. In the worst case scenario it should be advertising, considering how specific the target audience is that woul make sense.

Also, as stated previously, anyone can just prepay years of Live at the current pricepoint...



Around the Network

As for Live being free :


NEVER !!!


I pay 50 bucks a year for it and it has provided the three best online gaming years i've ever had. Somethings are just worth the price.

If anything i would pay more to get :

language specific communities (at leasty the main ones : english - chinese - spanish - french - german )

kid-free communities (keep those locked in school please)



wichdog69 said:
NO! If they raise the cost for live I'll have to get rid of my 360 and get a PS3. I will not pay a dollar more for something that should be free in the first place.

The Xbox 360 is four and a half years old already. You won't have to buy too many more XBL Gold cards to last you the rest of the generation anyway. I bet if you worked out the math: Buying a PS3 at $300, selling the used 360, free online vs. Keeping the 360, paying for XBL Gold for a couple more years until the gen is over (and if you buy on sale, you won't pay the full price), you probably won't end up saving much or at all anyway.



fighter said:
As for Live being free :


NEVER !!!


I pay 50 bucks a year for it and it has provided the three best online gaming years i've ever had. Somethings are just worth the price.

If anything i would pay more to get :

language specific communities (at leasty the main ones : english - chinese - spanish - french - german )

kid-free communities (keep those locked in school please)

I would actually *love* it if they set an age filter on games but I don't see that happening, mainly because it's assumed kids aren't supposed to be playing the M rated games anyways...



This is like when Patcher said that XBL will increase to 100 bucks. Everybody started to flip out and started saying that they wouldn't pay more. First of all, I dont think they'll ever increase the price of Live anyway, unless its for a non obligatory premium. They'll make the service better and keep the same price. And lets see what they bring and what they do with the price before we comment on RUMORS.



twesterm said:
fighter said:
As for Live being free :


NEVER !!!


I pay 50 bucks a year for it and it has provided the three best online gaming years i've ever had. Somethings are just worth the price.

If anything i would pay more to get :

language specific communities (at leasty the main ones : english - chinese - spanish - french - german )

kid-free communities (keep those locked in school please)

I would actually *love* it if they set an age filter on games but I don't see that happening, mainly because it's assumed kids aren't supposed to be playing the M rated games anyways...

 

 

That would be great, right ?

As for restrictins,, people aren't supposed to hack 360, still they do, and get banned. I would love the sound of a kid crying about not being able to play MW2 anymore.