Forums - Website Issues - Trying to criticize vgchartz.

I was banned for this thread:

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=105548&page=2

 

Trying to criticize vgchartz is hard.

If they can`t take it how will they develope?

It`s like fanatics filtering out the truth.

At least discussion is needed when they don`t agree or else they will be laughed hard at.

Nuff` said.



Around the Network
Well, I'm sorry to tell you, but your 'critique' was pretty pointless, as everyone else in that thread pointed out.

Guild Wars 2

Because you were being insulting.

Be mature and you'll get maturity in response.

Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

you're way off, again

I dont agree, but i see the flawed review system.

Around the Network
Well I double dare you to discuss the thread I linked instead of acting immature.

Their is criticism and then their is just being disrespectful. Considering your thread got locked and I know for the most part the moderating team uses level-headed judgment, you must have been doing the latter.

All forums and sites, including this one, respect every user's freedom of speech and ability to have their opinions voiced. However, everyone is subject to the rules and we are all subject to the notions of justice. And as civilized human beings we should show common acceptance and respect for one another.

I've had my disagreements with reviews and the review system on this site and others numerous times, but sometimes it's better to agree to disagree. Or if you want to voice your opinion on such matter, keep it nameless and talk conceptually. It'll gain you more credibility.

Zucas said:
Their is criticism and then their is just being disrespectful. Considering your thread got locked and I know for the most part the moderating team uses level-headed judgment, you must have been doing the latter.

All forums and sites, including this one, respect every user's freedom of speech and ability to have their opinions voiced. However, everyone is subject to the rules and we are all subject to the notions of justice. And as civilized human beings we should show common acceptance and respect for one another.

I've had my disagreements with reviews and the review system on this site and others numerous times, but sometimes it's better to agree to disagree. Or if you want to voice your opinion on such matter, keep it nameless and talk conceptually. It'll gain you more credibility.

So freedom of speech with rules? Are you kidding?

 

It`s better to agree or disagree? Where`s the freedom in that?

 

I`ll continue to use MY freedom of speech until I get perma banned.

I do not care about rules or credibility.

If people open their eyes a tad, they will understand my points and agree or disagree vi a discussion.

But these rules comes from a moral that no one dares to change.

Why?



Citan said:

So freedom of speech with rules? Are you kidding?

 

It`s better to agree or disagree? Where`s the freedom in that?

 

I`ll continue to use MY freedom of speech until I get perma banned.

I do not care about rules or credibility.

If people open their eyes a tad, they will understand my points and agree or disagree vi a discussion.

But these rules comes from a moral that no one dares to change.

Why?

You are operating off of false assumptions concerning privately-owned message boards on the internet.

To the best of my knowledge, no country in the world has freedom of speech laws that apply to privately owned organizations, wherein you can say anything you want and retain membership. This message board is not a democracy, it's an effective dictatorship where Brett does his level best to be a benevolent dictator.

But Brett has set down guidelines for what is and is not acceptable conduct on his website. You operate outside of that code of conduct in peril of your membership.

That's all there is.



Around the Network
Khuutra said:
Citan said:

So freedom of speech with rules? Are you kidding?

 

It`s better to agree or disagree? Where`s the freedom in that?

 

I`ll continue to use MY freedom of speech until I get perma banned.

I do not care about rules or credibility.

If people open their eyes a tad, they will understand my points and agree or disagree vi a discussion.

But these rules comes from a moral that no one dares to change.

Why?

You are operating off of false assumptions concerning privately-owned message boards on the internet.

To the best of my knowledge, no country in the world has freedom of speech laws that apply to privately owned organizations, wherein you can say anything you want and retain membership. This message board is not a democracy, it's an effective dictatorship where Brett does his level best to be a benevolent dictator.

But Brett has set down guidelines for what is and is not acceptable conduct on his website. You operate outside of that code of conduct in peril of your membership.

That's all there is.

He needs to change hes moral code and there will be more members and nicer discussion.

Freedom makes peace. Dictatorship makes war and resistance.

That`s all there is.