Anyone whos not biased towards a ps3 should admit crysis is better than killzone 2. Leo-j will never admit it because well go back to the start of this post lol and work it out. He always wants it to win everything, when clearly it just dont stand up. Btw leo, you can know for a fact all you want, but that doesnt change the FACT i own killzone 2 and uncharted 2. Neither are even close tbh. I wouldnt expect them to be either.

OK from this post I can either say with pretty good conviction that the PS3 is the only console you have ever had or that you have played all your 360 games on a 13 inch tube tv. Seriously can you be so blind to think that those games are a whole generation ahead of any other game, have you ever even seen what a generational gap looks like for consoles?

Shame, I thought you had changed from your old ways, although your still young so you do have a bit more maturing to do.

Looks better than killzone 2. (In your opinion it might be better)

I'm not stating which is better, i'm just trying to save you before you get flamed to death.

I can't believe how delusional PS3 fans on this website are, KZ2 doesn't compare to Crysis and if you think it does you must have one shitty computer. The top PS3 games in this gen are NOT even close to a generation better than the best games on 360 either, if you truly believe that this is either your first generation EVER or you have never played a 360. The top games on PS3 look better than the top 360 games, but if you think it's a generational difference than it's clear that all the fanboy BS has truly rotted what's left of your brain.

It's always been this way, PS2 fans argued that their system was graphically superior to both Xbox and GameCube which is ridiculous. So now that the PS3 has a slight edge over the 360 they blow it way out of proportion. You must not be that satisfied with your purchase if you feel you need to do this.

Don't generalize.

Many PS3 fans said Crysis looks better.

I tried to show him: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3246641&page=1&postnum=49

But in terms of graphics he still acts like that little boy from 2 years ago.
A bit sad, because apart from that he really changed for the better.

For the record, I've moved away from being a mainly PC gamer, to being a PS3 gamer exclusively. And Crysis looks way better than Killzone 2.

However, I think Killzone 2 will look better than Crysis 2 on the PS3 and possibly the XBox360, if what they said is true (that the console versions are "identical").

Some direct screenshots of both games (unsure what version the Crysis 2 screenshots come from):
http://www.gamesthirst.com/2010/04/10/in-game-crysis-2-screens-vs-in-game-killzone-2-screens/

Crysis 2 just looks...ugly. Everything is all over the place.  Texture quality is iffy and the quality varies wildly, no AA, seemingly no AF. I'm sure that on a PC, Crysis 2 on high is going to look fantastic. But the console version looks like it would be the equivalent of the low/medium setting on the PC. I mean, damn, it's ugly.

Crytek are awesome, and they know how to build a powerful engine. But I question their ability to make a power engine that's well optimized, and has the ability to take advantage of what the power the consoles offer.  Instead of building a super powerful engine and then scaling down to what the power of the console, they should have scaled up to match the consoles.  That way you don't have decent looking buildings in the background, and shitty ground textures right in front of you.  It's like they just chose random textures to downgrade, instead of building up each texture so that everything is uniform in quality.

Of course, all of this could be moot if those screenshots came from the PC version on low settings (why they would have released screenshots like that is beyond me though).

Killzone 2 isn't even close to Crysis on a technical level and arguably behind artistically too given the fact Crysis at least as some colour at the start.

So a 3 year old PC game looks better than anything on HD consoles today or even upcoming!?

WTF?

What "looks" better is subjective.

It's more technically advanced. Whether it looks better or not depends on what you like to look at. Also note that PC's have been outputting resolutions above HD for many years before the HD consoles.

I'm not sure, there is less variety in textures compared to Killzone 2. If anything, the small 6Gb install should indicate that. Obviously on a technical level Crysis blows KZ2 out of the water.