I think leo-j is crying in a corner.

Or he's laughing his head off that this thread has managed 11 pages of arguing the obvious.

sigh.. its pretty obvious Crysis is technacly more advanced than any game on a console.. for a fact you can run that game at 60+fps 1080P at VERY HIGH on an amazing gaming rig, and there you go.. its far ahead of any console game..

KZ2 is a better looking game, better textures, better looking environment, etc.. The gun itself seems alot more detailed, but yes CRYSIS is open world, with very realistic graphics, and can be upped to the point that no console can run it at a descent framerate..

but KZ2 is the better looker in my opinion, and in many of those that have both games.. as is U2, GOW III. But Crysis is technicly a much more advanced game..

what did the OP ask again? Which is technicly better, or which looks better?

leo-j; take comfort in the fact that Crysis is still a shitty game however you look at the technical aspects or compare it to other games.

Play it.

Also Gears 2 isnt even as good looking as Uncharted 1

Alan Wake has some real bad textures and most of the time we have seen some in engine cut scenes

The PS3 is much better than the 360 graphically (just look at Poseidon in GoW3 or the Herkules fight on youtube) , but still Crysis looks better than Killzone 2.