By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - The First in-game shots of Crysis 2 are no where near KZ2

SpartanFX said:
waron said:
funny how ps3 fans are arguing that killzone 2 looks better than crysis 2 with 2-3 month old screens of Crysis 2 that not only shows nothing but pile of garbage but also comes from old alpha version of the game and still ignore all GDC media that pretty much blown away everything killzone 2 could have. seriously, scripted events of killzone 2 vs realtime events of crysis 2, corridor shooter vs sandbox, dark game with nothing but simple looking warehouses vs rich open environment of new york full of skysrcapers and vegetation.

and we still have statements from all journalists who've seen latest version of the game - Crysis 2 is not the best looking 360 game, is not the best looking ps3 game and is not even best lopking atari 2600 game. it's THE BEST LOOKING CONSOLE GAME. PERIOD. and by the way it was still alpha footage that was shown.

it's so typical of you to comments on the things you don't know,,,this picture is from video released to public on APRIL 9 2010:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yfdiZKER4A&feature=player_embedded

 

when are you gonna learn not to comment on the things you think you know but in reality u don't????

 

 

Oh thank you for the video.  After seeing it it looks much better than the pic shown haha.  Just a bad pic from the game.  Actually looks quite spectacular. 



Around the Network
Zucas said:
SpartanFX said:
waron said:
funny how ps3 fans are arguing that killzone 2 looks better than crysis 2 with 2-3 month old screens of Crysis 2 that not only shows nothing but pile of garbage but also comes from old alpha version of the game and still ignore all GDC media that pretty much blown away everything killzone 2 could have. seriously, scripted events of killzone 2 vs realtime events of crysis 2, corridor shooter vs sandbox, dark game with nothing but simple looking warehouses vs rich open environment of new york full of skysrcapers and vegetation.

and we still have statements from all journalists who've seen latest version of the game - Crysis 2 is not the best looking 360 game, is not the best looking ps3 game and is not even best lopking atari 2600 game. it's THE BEST LOOKING CONSOLE GAME. PERIOD. and by the way it was still alpha footage that was shown.

it's so typical of you to comments on the things you don't know,,,this picture is from video released to public on APRIL 9 2010:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yfdiZKER4A&feature=player_embedded

 

when are you gonna learn not to comment on the things you think you know but in reality u don't????

 

 

Oh thank you for the video.  After seeing it it looks much better than the pic shown haha.  Just a bad pic from the game.  Actually looks quite spectacular. 

yea it does look much better in motion,,,i agree.It's gonna be the ebst lookign multiplat engine .this will hopefully see to it that the UE3  die.

 

graphic comparsion with KZ2 are not that fair,,,,This game still has time to be polished,,,it's open world with real time destruction.

 

on the eyes KZ2 is more apealing but again it's not as impressive as cryengine when you take in acount what cryengine offers.

 

This is an awesome news for us gamers.

 

the only reason i made the thread was casue i though it will be imperssive engine wise and will top KZ2,U2 and the likes graphic-wise,,,but graphically it's short of those on the consoles but it is impressive nevertheless.



 

 

 

SpartanFX said:
Zucas said:
SpartanFX said:
waron said:
funny how ps3 fans are arguing that killzone 2 looks better than crysis 2 with 2-3 month old screens of Crysis 2 that not only shows nothing but pile of garbage but also comes from old alpha version of the game and still ignore all GDC media that pretty much blown away everything killzone 2 could have. seriously, scripted events of killzone 2 vs realtime events of crysis 2, corridor shooter vs sandbox, dark game with nothing but simple looking warehouses vs rich open environment of new york full of skysrcapers and vegetation.

and we still have statements from all journalists who've seen latest version of the game - Crysis 2 is not the best looking 360 game, is not the best looking ps3 game and is not even best lopking atari 2600 game. it's THE BEST LOOKING CONSOLE GAME. PERIOD. and by the way it was still alpha footage that was shown.

it's so typical of you to comments on the things you don't know,,,this picture is from video released to public on APRIL 9 2010:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yfdiZKER4A&feature=player_embedded

 

when are you gonna learn not to comment on the things you think you know but in reality u don't????

 

 

Oh thank you for the video.  After seeing it it looks much better than the pic shown haha.  Just a bad pic from the game.  Actually looks quite spectacular. 

yea it does look much better in motion,,,i agree.It's gonna be the ebst lookign multiplat engine .this will hopefully see to it that the UE3  die.

 

graphic comparsion with KZ2 are not that fair,,,,This game still has time to be polished,,,it's open world with real time destruction.

 

on the eyes KZ2 is more apealing but again it's not as impressive as cryengine when you take in acount what cryengine offers.

 

This is an awesome news for us gamers.

 

the only reason i made the thread was casue i though it will be imperssive engine wise and will top KZ2,U2 and the ;likes,,,but graphically it's short of those on the consoles but it is impressive nevertheless.

Well we are just going to have to disagree because I don't think KZ2 is all that impressive graphically.  Although it has its moments, it could have also used a lot of polishing.  Compare it to the likes of Uncharted 2 and you can see it's flaws.  What KZ2 does is it has certain areas that look spectacular (namely ones up close) while other aspects suffer.  Actually something that a lot of games have done with environments that are not really interactive.  RE4 kinda did that awhile ago with areas that look amazingly good but suffered when you compared it to other areas around it and of course areas that could be interacted with.  KZ2 sees it suffering mainly from textures far-away such as you can see the buildings in that pic shown here.  Also some areas up-close look good but the objects around it just don't match.  And then of course character models are not to brag about.

And that's where Uncharted 2 and to some extend God of War 3 are just superior.  And overall better polish for the game as a whole.  This is somethign I expect GG to fix with the 3rd one whenever it eventually comes out but I think KZ2 could have used a much better overall polishing.  But I would agree that that video of Crysis 2 compared to say Uncharted 2 right now would be rather lacking.  But I guess we'll give it some time and see how it goes.  Not trying to bag on KZ2, but graphically I think Uncharted 2 was much much better and showed the strenght of the veteran developer that is Naughty Dog with their strong attention to detail and overall finish.



Not to say Killzone 2 doesn't look good; its just that everything looks metal, with its grey colour deficient world.



yog-sothot said:
I need to see all this in HD and in motion before I can make any astatement on "which on looks better"

if you are talking about animations, that something sony studios excels at. so won't look better.

@waron what's this? , no isn't a cut scen. it's real game play from campaign

@platinum , the thing is helghast world ti's like that, there is also sand desert, and and beach in mp, but seriously that just artistic decisions.



Around the Network
leo-j said:
DaColdFlash said:
RiksK15 said:
Who cares anyway, when Killzone 3 will be released it will have better graphics than Crysis 1&2 on PC combined!
Crysis (PC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KZ3
Crysis 2 PC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KZ3 > Crysis 2 (XBOX360,PS§)

So don't worry!

 

KZ2>Crysis on PC on very high

I dare you to edit my post.


Really?  Show me stuff in Killzone 2 that is more impressive than this turtle in Crysis.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKfHMJeZqNg&feature=fvw



SpartanFX said:
Zucas said:
SpartanFX said:

it's so typical of you to comments on the things you don't know,,,this picture is from video released to public on APRIL 9 2010:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yfdiZKER4A&feature=player_embedded

 

when are you gonna learn not to comment on the things you think you know but in reality u don't????

 

 

Oh thank you for the video.  After seeing it it looks much better than the pic shown haha.  Just a bad pic from the game.  Actually looks quite spectacular. 

yea it does look much better in motion,,,i agree.It's gonna be the ebst lookign multiplat engine .this will hopefully see to it that the UE3  die.

 

graphic comparsion with KZ2 are not that fair,,,,This game still has time to be polished,,,it's open world with real time destruction.

 

on the eyes KZ2 is more apealing but again it's not as impressive as cryengine when you take in acount what cryengine offers.

 

This is an awesome news for us gamers.

 

the only reason i made the thread was casue i though it will be imperssive engine wise and will top KZ2,U2 and the likes graphic-wise,,,but graphically it's short of those on the consoles but it is impressive nevertheless.

That's the thing, Killzone 2 because it was designed as a rather linear and scripted experience means they could "fake" events. The techniques they used also allowed them to "fake" a lot of the visuals and effects to make the game look more appealing as you've stated. Sometimes they come off whilst other times certain textures seen in certain lights can just look a little off. Cryengine 3 does a lot more on the same hardware whilst still looking visually impressive. It wouldn't suprise me to see the game looking a lot better when released than these screens and vid.



kZ2 could be better in some ways



                                  

                                       That's Gordon Freeman in "Real-Life"
 

 

CASS1DY said:
SpartanFX said:
coolbeans said:
SpartanFX said:

Don't get me wrong ,,,it's better than UE3 games but I thought this was supposed to set a new graphical heights for PS3.

 

 

 

lol..and you would know this how?

i m saying it looks better,,how??by looking at it comparing it to trillion ue3 games

I bet Gears of war 3 will look better then killzone 2 graphically,gears2 was damn close.

i have gears 2 its no where near impressive as killzone 2, gears 3 wont be much of a jump from gears 2, they have no choice but to fit it all on a dvd,



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

i dont think ppl know what grafix are these days.

its about how the overall game looks on your telly, not which one has scripted destruction or which one hasnt.



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...