its fake imo. Almost all the new pokemon look so badly made and ridiculous even for pokemon standards.

Well if this was true it would be my first time picking a grass type starter.

yeah, i would imagine the secondary dragon type would help pretty much destroy everything early on in the game fire/ground will be totally owned by water though its a very strange combo

fake, but some of those are truly awesome

i kinda wish that Nintendo would take a look at these

definitely fake. 3 of them are listed on there twice. and I really doubt they will do any more Regi's.

also, what the hell is up with Gastrodon!?

That and it looks badass lol.

It totally looks fake IMO. and I think I counted around 220ish new species there. that's would be more than any other gen which were 151,100,135 and 107.

I'm still hoping for a Fire/Dragon.

Smeags said: Actually, we still haven't seen a pure Flying type... get on that Game Freak!

There actually is a reason why we don't have a pure Flying type yet. If you would teach a flying pokemon roost, and they use that in battle, they would not be any single type for one turn. I think that messes up the games but I'm not sure. They could fix this possible error in the 5th gen onwards, just make it that the bird is ??? type for one turn and everything would just do normal damage to you. lol

What about Charizard, or is he considered Fire/Flying?