jarrod said:
greenmedic88 said: it's generally acknowledged that they changed (read: lightened) their standards right around the turn of the century. So scores for later consoles will generally be higher (unfortunately, not for the Wii). |
Well, that's not entirely true. If we go by perfect Famitsu scores (40/40)...
- Wii (4 games)
- DS (2 games)
- N64, DC, PS1, GC, PS2, PS3, 360 (1 game each)
|
The only thing the OP took into consideration was the overall average of Famitsu scores. Do they determine "best library ever?" Hardly.
Two problems that I already brought up: one, this is Famitsu. Famitsu has scored a lot more leniently since the 2000s. They used to have the reputation of doling out some of the most critical scores. Not now.
Two: averages. The Wii has the largest installed user base and as a result, draws the most low budget, rushed titles to the platform, same as the PS2 last generation. Four perfect scores for the Wii neither cancel out a boatload of 4 and 5 average scores, nor do they make up a "best library ever" unless you only buy 4 games per cycle or something similarly ridiculous.
Overall average for the Wii was still around 19% due to all the low scoring titles that hopefully not many people actually bought.
The numbers for the PS3 are probably a better reflection of the library having fewer average killing clunker scores than anything else. Given the lower installed user base and greater costs associated with development, this shouldn't come as a surprise.