Quantcast
The Best RTS...

Forums - PC Discussion - The Best RTS...

Rickz0r said:
KungKras said:
Helios got here before me once again :)

Rickz0r, If you say that CoH is the best RTS, then be prepared to face the people who disagree with you, and be prepared to make your case instead of making unproven statments that you are unable to back up and then ending the discussion because people are "teh blind fanboyz".

@Bolded, I absolutely not said that. And you should check my reason why I made the thread title that way.. I wanted to end the discussion bout Starcraft, since I wanted to talk bout CoH

"I ended the discussion with KungKras rather quickly, since he couldn't be convinced to take over my standpoint anyway. I'm convinced that he played Starcraft when it was released / when he was younger. It gave him a certain impression, and he won't let go of that."

That's not the impression I got from the above quote.

If you wanted to talk about CoH and not any other RTS you could have just said so from the beginning and I would have stopped :P

A thread title like "CoH is amazing" would have helped.

 



I LOVE ICELAND!

Around the Network

The best RTS is also the originator of the modern realtime strategy game, Herzog Zwei released in 1989 on the Megadrive. To this day a match with a competent player is one of the most intense gaming experiences I have ever had.



I don't mean to say which game is better but IMHO Company of Heroes is funner for me than Starcraft.

Starcraft is nowadays only played on Ultra fast setting and seems to me to be down to who can get his hyper efficient build order completed first and throw his units into the fray. I really really don't like resource collecting or basebuilding that much at all and will always like RTSes (or RTTs if you want to be technical) that eliminate or reduce that aspect in favor of combat. (Like CoH and World in Conflict)

Not to say that Starcraft isn't a great game, It has one of the best stories and voice acting in gaming, even today!



KungKras said:
Rickz0r said:
KungKras said:
Helios got here before me once again :)

Rickz0r, If you say that CoH is the best RTS, then be prepared to face the people who disagree with you, and be prepared to make your case instead of making unproven statments that you are unable to back up and then ending the discussion because people are "teh blind fanboyz".

@Bolded, I absolutely not said that. And you should check my reason why I made the thread title that way.. I wanted to end the discussion bout Starcraft, since I wanted to talk bout CoH

"I ended the discussion with KungKras rather quickly, since he couldn't be convinced to take over my standpoint anyway. I'm convinced that he played Starcraft when it was released / when he was younger. It gave him a certain impression, and he won't let go of that."

That's not the impression I got from the above quote.

If you wanted to talk about CoH and not any other RTS you could have just said so from the beginning and I would have stopped :P

A thread title like "CoH is amazing" would have helped.

 

@Bolded,

Well, can't do anything about that.. When I say that you didn't want to take over my standpoint anyway, I didn't mean you were a fanboy. Only that Starcraft made a certain impression a few years back when you played it, and you won't let go of that. And I think I'm right at that..



KungKras said:
Rickz0r said:
KungKras said:
Helios got here before me once again :)

Rickz0r, If you say that CoH is the best RTS, then be prepared to face the people who disagree with you, and be prepared to make your case instead of making unproven statments that you are unable to back up and then ending the discussion because people are "teh blind fanboyz".

@Bolded, I absolutely not said that. And you should check my reason why I made the thread title that way.. I wanted to end the discussion bout Starcraft, since I wanted to talk bout CoH

"I ended the discussion with KungKras rather quickly, since he couldn't be convinced to take over my standpoint anyway. I'm convinced that he played Starcraft when it was released / when he was younger. It gave him a certain impression, and he won't let go of that."

That's not the impression I got from the above quote.

If you wanted to talk about CoH and not any other RTS you could have just said so from the beginning and I would have stopped :P

A thread title like "CoH is amazing" would have helped.

 

Like I said, if I created a thread title like that, It wouldn't have got this much of response. It would've died rather quickly, because I'm new, and people are more likely to visit the threads of 'the elders' then 'the youngsters'.



Around the Network
Rickz0r said:
 

Like I said, if I created a thread title like that, It wouldn't have got this much of response. It would've died rather quickly, because I'm new, and people are more likely to visit the threads of 'the elders' then 'the youngsters'.

I doubt they would have. It would have been avoided probably because people agree and there is nothing to be said more than that, it's not a discussion it's a statement and that's that. It's the PC game forum and it's very rare that you will see people circle-jerking themselves over a game coughMGS4cough for more than maybe one post.

Also, yougot your goal, the trhead got hits and responses. Starcarft is still the best though.



mirgro said:
Rickz0r said:
 

Like I said, if I created a thread title like that, It wouldn't have got this much of response. It would've died rather quickly, because I'm new, and people are more likely to visit the threads of 'the elders' then 'the youngsters'.

I doubt they would have. It would have been avoided probably because people agree and there is nothing to be said more than that, it's not a discussion it's a statement and that's that. It's the PC game forum and it's very rare that you will see people circle-jerking themselves over a game coughMGS4cough for more than maybe one post.

Also, yougot your goal, the trhead got hits and responses. Starcarft is still the best though.

Keep on living in the past



I have company of heroes. Its pretty good.. However, I think it has too much micro-management.



Check out my game about moles ^

Rickz0r said:
mirgro said:
Rickz0r said:
 

Like I said, if I created a thread title like that, It wouldn't have got this much of response. It would've died rather quickly, because I'm new, and people are more likely to visit the threads of 'the elders' then 'the youngsters'.

I doubt they would have. It would have been avoided probably because people agree and there is nothing to be said more than that, it's not a discussion it's a statement and that's that. It's the PC game forum and it's very rare that you will see people circle-jerking themselves over a game coughMGS4cough for more than maybe one post.

Also, yougot your goal, the trhead got hits and responses. Starcarft is still the best though.

Keep on living in the past

but starcraft is the future NOW B_E_L_I_V_E

 

 

 

but seriously can't wait for that steam sale, By the way have you ever played the game Soldiers: Heroes of WWII I recintly starded playing it at LANs and it is pretty good you control a small group of soldiers and or tanks the campaign can be brutal but is fun 4 player co-op.



@TheVoxelman on twitter

Check out my hype threads: Cyberpunk, and The Witcher 3!

O-D-C said:


Seconded. Don't care if it's not deep, or sophisticated, it's the only RTS I still play because it's fun. I just wish they had fixed the damn prism tanks.



"Now, a fun game should always be easy to understand - you should be able to take one look at it and know what you have to do straight away. It should be so well constructed that you can tell at a glance what your goal is and, even if you don’t succeed, you’ll blame yourself rather than the game. Moreover, the people standing around watching the game have also got to be able to enjoy it." - Shiggy

A Koopa's Revenge II gameplay video