If you havent realized by now, the 360 has a lot more games for it than the PS3 you know seeing as how it was released a year earlier.
If you havent realized by now, the 360 has a lot more games for it than the PS3 you know seeing as how it was released a year earlier.
PizzaFaceGamer said: @heedstone - That was one year |
Haha, yup and it'll be this year too!
How many games do YOU play that are over a year old by the way? I can't say that I play very many at all....
The dude abides
letsdance said:
We all know if the game doesn't recieve 90 or up on meta then its not worth playing. |
So you just came in here to troll. Gotcha ;)
buh! try doing this topic with diferent and more importatnt numbers
Because the XBOX has been out longer and has more games. Both system are good. And both systems have stats that shine and stats that blow........
hasanwhy said: hahaha, nahhh. In your opinion, the Xbox 360 has the better set of games, but personally I don't like half of them. The same applies to the PS3 for me as well; Just because there is more games for a single system doesn't mean people are going to jump the gun and purchase one right away. |
Wow. You must play a lot of games if you can judge whether or not you dislike 150 of them rated 75 or higher. Wish I had that much free time. You must also be very very picky about the games you play. I wonder which half you like. Maybe you could list them for us.
fastyxx said:
Wow. You must play a lot of games if you can judge whether or not you dislike 150 of them rated 75 or higher. Wish I had that much free time. You must also be very very picky about the games you play. I wonder which half you like. Maybe you could list them for us. |
Well, in his defense. Most of the sports games get over 75, and I dislike them all. How many sports games are there?
That should get me halfway there
PizzaFaceGamer said: Hey, the facts are the facts. |
Were a year behind..
http://features.metacritic.com/features/2009/the-best-games-of-2009/
PS3 wins 2009...
But I don't know... I mean only about 40 games a year hit my radar... per platform... and the 40 big releases on PS3 just seem to be better than the 40 big releases on 360, and since I need not purchase 50 or so games a year... (like most people) in the end I'm better off with a PS3.
Not really a figure which anyone either cares about, or effects anyone. Doesn't seem to effect sales either.
I'd also make an argument that the PS3 has been released for a shorter period of time, which accounts to a lower total game count... so the PS3 has 44% of it's games at 75+ standard whereas the 360 38%, which is of some significance.