By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales Discussion - PS3 will never catch the the 360 now. Wii won a long time ago.

Skeeuk said:
@hammertime.

wii has won from business standpoint, but it has by far the lowest quality games. so as a gaming device its dead last

The vast majority disagrees.  Quality is inherently subjective, but the most people clearly prefer the games on Wii to those on 360 or PS3.



Around the Network

Your thread is generic.



4 ≈ One

SaviorX said:
theprof00 said:
SaviorX said:
 

What exactly did he say that was wild? The only thing that didn't make sense to me were those two words, "generic games". That seems to be what people are up in arms over.

PS3 has played all their trump cards almost (slim, price reduction) and only have one left

as people who want these generic games already have a PS3

So basically the gap will not really change and we can see that as it is basically still about 6 million

The motion devices for both consoles will do little

most won't buy into it as the hardware did not come originally with the console

For the most part, I agree with him.

 

 

I think the only thing the PS3 has left to spur hardware significantly is Gran Turismo and maybe 1-3 price drops. With how Microsoft retaliates to things, they may also drop price or make a Slim to negate Sony's potential gains in marketshare.  He feels that people who wanted GOW3 and/or FF13 might have bought the console a long time ago, hence a lower than expected HW boost from either title. He probably doesn't believe they will somehow make the PS3 reach a higher plataeu in HW sales. Natal has a greater potential to boost HW than Move ever will, but with the 360 already being 5 years old the effect will not be that great.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agent, nier replicant, the last guardian, gt5, FF13Versus, TwistedMetal, ModnationRacers, New Yakuza, LBP2, Killzone 3, along with the many unnanounced titles that Sony has mentioned to show at e3. About 3 price drops.

He has no proof that people who wanted gow3 or ff13 already bought the system. FF13 gave ps3 a huge boost, hence, not everyone had the system for the game. Same happened to GTA4 and others. Everytime someone bring this up, they are proven wrong.

Maybe the slim 360 can negate sales, but they are already at the 200$ price point, which is far more important that a 300$ slim ps3. It will not make as big of a difference as going from 400$ to 300$ and changing a case that a lot of people felt the urge to hate. This is also trending to be ps3s biggest year, while 360 has already peaked.

Natal doesn't have a greater potential anything, they are both very similar and target the same market. They will do about the same, give or take some unforeseen smash hit or fad.



Some interesting replies and points....I just ignore the guys who throw the toys out the pram. I still stand by my points though but that's cool, it would be boring if we all agreed on everything.



jarrod said:
loves2splooge said:
You have to seriously wonder whether Sony and Microsoft are in this business to make money. All these price cuts to gain an edge over each other and for what? When does Sony plan to recoup all the money they lost with the PS3 (especially when their corporation as a whole is in the red) and when does MS plan on recouping all the money they spent on the Xbox brand?

Microsoft's fine, and they see Xbox strategically as competitive floodwall to safeguard their Wintel empire.  As long as PlayStation exists, they'll keep pouring money in, profitable or not. And believe me, they have cash to spare and then some.

Sony's in a more precarious position, they're not near as financially sound as Microsoft and (before this gen) PlayStation was seen as one of their profit centers.  I think PS3 was planned a trojan to help Blu-ray supplant DVD, but I also don't think they expected to sacrifice near this much in the process.  Plus they also had to dilute their ownership in Blu-ray significantly to get traction with parnters, to the point where they're not even the top license holder in the group anymore (Matsushitsa is, Sony's 2nd).  It's been a bit of pyrrhic victory for Sony, but I don't see them ever giving up either.

Really though, both Sony and Microsoft see their games businesses as proxies for media hubs and other content businesses, so they'll keep chipping away at it regardless of profit and because the end gain is so attractive.  The only hardware company that really seems to be in the industry primarily for the industry (ie: games) is Nintendo.  I miss Sega, Hudson and SNK. :/

Sony is in the more precarious position for sure because they are in the red as a whole and Microsoft, the corporation, is firmly in the black. But MS has to watch out for the interests of their shareholders too. Microsoft is very profitable but their stock apparently isn`t exactly that great these days. For a company like Microsoft that has grown so much over the years, that growth had to slow down eventually though. You can`t have rising stocks all the time. But you know how shareholders are. Its all about, "what have you done for me lately?" with them. Especially for those who bought Microsoft stock recently.



Around the Network
loves2splooge said:
jarrod said:
loves2splooge said:
You have to seriously wonder whether Sony and Microsoft are in this business to make money. All these price cuts to gain an edge over each other and for what? When does Sony plan to recoup all the money they lost with the PS3 (especially when their corporation as a whole is in the red) and when does MS plan on recouping all the money they spent on the Xbox brand?

Microsoft's fine, and they see Xbox strategically as competitive floodwall to safeguard their Wintel empire.  As long as PlayStation exists, they'll keep pouring money in, profitable or not. And believe me, they have cash to spare and then some.

Sony's in a more precarious position, they're not near as financially sound as Microsoft and (before this gen) PlayStation was seen as one of their profit centers.  I think PS3 was planned a trojan to help Blu-ray supplant DVD, but I also don't think they expected to sacrifice near this much in the process.  Plus they also had to dilute their ownership in Blu-ray significantly to get traction with parnters, to the point where they're not even the top license holder in the group anymore (Matsushitsa is, Sony's 2nd).  It's been a bit of pyrrhic victory for Sony, but I don't see them ever giving up either.

Really though, both Sony and Microsoft see their games businesses as proxies for media hubs and other content businesses, so they'll keep chipping away at it regardless of profit and because the end gain is so attractive.  The only hardware company that really seems to be in the industry primarily for the industry (ie: games) is Nintendo.  I miss Sega, Hudson and SNK. :/

Sony is in the more precarious position for sure. But MS has to watch out for the interests of their shareholders too. Microsoft is very profitable but their stock apparently isn`t exactly that great these days. For a company like Microsoft that has grown so much over the years, that growth had to slow down eventually though. You can`t have rising stocks all the time. But you know how shareholders are. Its all about, "what have you done for me lately?" with them.

Yeah, but whenever the shareholders get pissy, Microsoft just starts doing favorable buybacks and options.  They like to "moneyhat" everyone it seems. lol.

Plus, I'd say Xbox is out of the woods at this point, it's actually seen as an attractive business by shareholders these days and it's been shouldering the struggling Zune business too.  Microsft won't ever need to "account" for the previous losses on Xbox 1, and 360's profitable now and will likely be profitable overall by the time the generation ends.  That's probably the best they could've hoped for, and is how Microsoft seems to prefer entering new markets (loss with the first model, profit with the second, takeover with the third).



theprof00 said:
70% of console total sales happen in the 200$ price range. Keep up the good work, gumshoe.

yea... and 99% of console total sales happen below $300 unless the item gets discontinued early.

I can spout stats too

Now, I'm not saying price can't be a hinderance, but reducing price won't magically boost sales either. There is also the issue that the PS2 (typically used to prove this 70% thing) spent a lot less time over $200 than it did under $200.




If you drop a PS3 right on top of a Wii, it would definitely defeat it. Not so sure about the Xbox360. - mancandy
In the past we played games. In the future we watch games. - Forest-Spirit
11/03/09 Desposit: Mod Bribery (RolStoppable)  vg$ 500.00
06/03/09 Purchase: Moderator Privilege  vg$ -50,000.00

Nordlead Jr. Photo/Video Gallery!!! (Video Added 4/19/10)

theprof00 said:
SaviorX said:
theprof00 said:
SaviorX said:
 

What exactly did he say that was wild? The only thing that didn't make sense to me were those two words, "generic games". That seems to be what people are up in arms over.

PS3 has played all their trump cards almost (slim, price reduction) and only have one left

as people who want these generic games already have a PS3

So basically the gap will not really change and we can see that as it is basically still about 6 million

The motion devices for both consoles will do little

most won't buy into it as the hardware did not come originally with the console

For the most part, I agree with him.

 I think the only thing the PS3 has left to spur hardware significantly is Gran Turismo and maybe 1-3 price drops. With how Microsoft retaliates to things, they may also drop price or make a Slim to negate Sony's potential gains in marketshare.  He feels that people who wanted GOW3 and/or FF13 might have bought the console a long time ago, hence a lower than expected HW boost from either title. He probably doesn't believe they will somehow make the PS3 reach a higher plataeu in HW sales. Natal has a greater potential to boost HW than Move ever will, but with the 360 already being 5 years old the effect will not be that great.

Agent, nier replicant, the last guardian, gt5, FF13Versus, TwistedMetal, ModnationRacers, New Yakuza, LBP2, Killzone 3, along with the many unnanounced titles that Sony has mentioned to show at e3. About 3 price drops.

He has no proof that people who wanted gow3 or ff13 already bought the system. FF13 gave ps3 a huge boost, hence, not everyone had the system for the game. Same happened to GTA4 and others. Everytime someone bring this up, they are proven wrong.

Maybe the slim 360 can negate sales, but they are already at the 200$ price point, which is far more important that a 300$ slim ps3. It will not make as big of a difference as going from 400$ to 300$ and changing a case that a lot of people felt the urge to hate. This is also trending to be ps3s biggest year, while 360 has already peaked.

Natal doesn't have a greater potential anything, they are both very similar and target the same market. They will do about the same, give or take some unforeseen smash hit or fad.

None of those games will boost PS3 sales past ~15k in their given release weeks except maybe FFversus13. His proof for existing owners already owning the console can be seen by the Hardware numbers. In Japan you can obviously see how much large titles can boost HW sales for any given console. In America/Others this is not as apparent unless it is something like Halo 3. Every time someone brings this up, the boost is too insignificant to blame on any one cause.

As for Natal, it differentiates itself from the Wii audience MUCH more than Sony's Move does. With Microsoft's large advertising resources and FUD creators, they could make their product much more known to the public than Sony can. Also, Sony's Move is rumored to start at $100 with the starter pack, a hefty price for an already expensive console.



Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. "  thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."

Christmas holidays can really screw up sales predictions. A little more than 6 months ago, the 360 was well on its way to widening their lead to 9 million against the PS3 with worldwide weekly sales in favor of the 360. Then Sony introduced a price cut via the slim along with some major games. Now the difference is around 6 million with worldwide weekly sales in favor of the PS3.

Hardly anyone predicted this would happen. There was an overwhelming sentiment that the 360 was going to keep at least a 10 million lead and end up as undisputed 2nd by the time next generation consoles arrived since the 360 usually does pretty well in the Christmas season. Now some people are convinced that the PS3 still has a chance. Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. Either way, it is too hard to tell at this point.



Hammertime said:

PS3 has played all their trump cards almost (slim, price reduction) and only have one left - GT5. GOW3 etc will sell 4 million but they will not be system sellers as people who want these generic games already have a PS3, same goes for Halo Reach on the 360....it will selll 10 milllion but won't push systems for more than a week or 2. So basically the gap will not really change and we can see that as it is basically still about 6 million. 360 if they bring out a slim will help sales but the gap will still hover around 5-7 million until both consoles are replaced. The motion devices for both consoles will do little as they were not included from the start and so will have limited support...a few games but most won't buy into it as the hardware did not come originally with the console so developers games will still be aimed at the 30 million+ consoles that don't have motion support.

As for Wii....well we all know it won the generation, well done Nintendo.

 

genric games? IDK about that but I do agree that PS3 wont catch up to 360 for as long as this gen is relevant



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler