Quantcast
GT5 vs Forza 3 Sceenshot Comparison... Can You Tell The Diffrence?

Forums - Gaming Discussion - GT5 vs Forza 3 Sceenshot Comparison... Can You Tell The Diffrence?

let's count the pixels!



There once was a great sig here, but it got killed.

A moment of silence would be appreciated.

Around the Network
gamelover2000 said:
huaxiong90 said:
fighter said:
imo sim fans will prefer 60fps, great online features and great physics over better graphics



it was understood that gt5 had better screenshots since years now, i would have prefered another criteria than that in this vs.

Please don't tell me you're trying to imply that FM3 does the mentioned features better than GT5.

I will agree on better online.. GT5:P was a mess in online.. but frame rate and physics? frame rate is 60FPS on both games (atleast on GT5) and did you even play the GT5 academy demo? damn..

GT5:P =/= GT5. I'm positive there'll be many improvements for the online in the final product.

 

And about the GT: Academy, I mentioned that in a later post.



Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!

Kojima: Come out with Project S already!

The 2nd interior pic pretty much gave it away.....



 

Favorite films. Foreign films forever!

 

Wow. All the Sony fans have got this very very wrong.

1st = 360 bottom.

2nd = 360 = top

3rd = 360 top

4th = 360 top

5th = 360 bottom.

 

 

I'm amazed that even the OP got this very wrong.

I'm not gloating here. Either. I'm genuinely surprised. 

Side by side, GT5 has more car detail, but the track detail is alot less. In both textures and amount of 3d modeling.

Still very amazed that many think Forza 3 screenshots are the better ones.



it's so obvious lol. top, top, bottom, bottom, top are GT5 shots.



Around the Network
dahuman said:

it's so obvious lol. top, top, bottom, bottom, top are GT5 shots.

Another person got it wrong. This is funny. The 2nd pic at the top is Forza 3. 'NOT' GT5. 

So much for GT5 blowing Forza 3 away graphically.



selnor said:
dahuman said:

it's so obvious lol. top, top, bottom, bottom, top are GT5 shots.

Another person got it wrong. This is funny. The 2nd pic at the top is Forza 3. 'NOT' GT5. 

So much for GT5 blowing Forza 3 away graphically.


that was a typo actually, I saw the japanese clear as day in the second pic =P



This is way too easy. Lightning and track layout pretty much give it away. Since Tokyo R246 is pretty much only on GT games, anyone that got picture 1,2,3 and 5 wrong hasn't played GT before. 

And Picture 4 is given away by the lightning. 

So 1 - Top; 2 - Bottom; 3 - Bottom; 4 - Bottom and 5 - Top



Current PC Build

CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"

When will you all clean up your act and stop comparing screenshots. FACT is that basically every game looks a lot nicer in screenshots than in-game.

Any genuine person will tell you that both games do not look as ultra realisitc as made out, especially Forza 3, which looks quite bad actually.

GT5P looksed better than F3 in Motion easily, and GT5P didn't even look that good. Seriously, do yourself a favour and play both games and compare, instead of proving your point by posting FAKE pictures. Then of course you will say that 'Oh no the dev's said they were in game shots' but THE FACT IS THAT THE GAMES DO NOT LOOK AS GOOD AS THE PICTURES SUGGEST.



They look essentially identical to me. You guys are tards.

When they are both out and playable then debate how they play as that's whats actually important.