By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - MAG or/vs Battlefield 2

MAG.

Battlefield is better if you want all the realistic crap, like bullet drop and all that. It's very strategic , so much so it leaves little room for controller-skill. MAG is a mixture of strategy and player ability, battlefield is a lot more strategy because of how it's set up, with the recoil/bullet drop/SLOW regeneration.

The good thing about MAG however is whilst team work is good, and all that. You're not reliant on it, on battlefield having an unco-operative squad can frequently cause frustration, and create an overall inconsistent playing experience. It just doesn't play that well in pubs.

Squads of 4 are also stupid. No viable spawns most of the time. Most the time it's a choice between stupid sniper A, B, or C. So yeah, LOOOONG walks on battlefield. Not on MAG.



Around the Network
Xero said:
MAG.

Battlefield is better if you want all the realistic crap, like bullet drop and all that. It's very strategic , so much so it leaves little room for controller-skill. MAG is a mixture of strategy and player ability, battlefield is a lot more strategy because of how it's set up, with the recoil/bullet drop/SLOW regeneration.

The good thing about MAG however is whilst team work is good, and all that. You're not reliant on it, on battlefield having an unco-operative squad can frequently cause frustration, and create an overall inconsistent playing experience. It just doesn't play that well in pubs.

Squads of 4 are also stupid. No viable spawns most of the time. Most the time it's a choice between stupid sniper A, B, or C. So yeah, LOOOONG walks on battlefield. Not on MAG.

So you like MAG, because it's more like CoD?



I have them both MAG and Badcompany 2, Depends on what I want to do, If I am in the mood for team work I go with MAG, If I am in the solo mode I play BC2, I knew BC2 would be great, But MAG was a surprise , It is a really god game, underrated in my opinion, but a lot of players have a hard time with teamwork, its all about them, and that is not what MAG is about. But what a game, Zipper did a superb job on this first of a kind. Kudos



battlefield i played the mag beta and liked it but battelfield is way better the PC version supports 32 players and since the objectives moves it feals a lot like mag but theres way more weapons etc its just that much better



Tiko7523 said:

so now that MAG has been out a couple of weeks and battlefield 2 has been out a week.

 

which one do you guys like? i have MAG i think its a good game but i dont feel the need to have 2 fps games at the same moment, which one is better? 

I'm in the same boat as you.  I was playing MW2 on 360 up until MAG came out, and now I'm hooked on MAG.  I really don't need another online shooter, and the demo for BC2 felt too much like MW2.  I love the Battlefield series, but I'm passing this new one up.




Around the Network

Was just playing Bad Company 2 and was loving it! Until Fucking Server kicked me out lost my new guns, and level up meaning i was DERANKED! this is pissing me off seriously, if it keeps up Bad Company 2 will have 1 less player and i will say hello to MAG seriously

What kind of server is this? that has to save every once in a while just to save your data, so stupid. I leveled up Oh server kicked me oh am back to my previous level wtf? I don't see any other Online FPS doing this



Akvod said:
Xero said:
MAG.

Battlefield is better if you want all the realistic crap, like bullet drop and all that. It's very strategic , so much so it leaves little room for controller-skill. MAG is a mixture of strategy and player ability, battlefield is a lot more strategy because of how it's set up, with the recoil/bullet drop/SLOW regeneration.

The good thing about MAG however is whilst team work is good, and all that. You're not reliant on it, on battlefield having an unco-operative squad can frequently cause frustration, and create an overall inconsistent playing experience. It just doesn't play that well in pubs.

Squads of 4 are also stupid. No viable spawns most of the time. Most the time it's a choice between stupid sniper A, B, or C. So yeah, LOOOONG walks on battlefield. Not on MAG.

So you like MAG, because it's more like CoD?

I like MAG because it's more like MAG. Trouble reading? Don't believe I mentioned the Call of Duty series anywhere.

Presumably an attempt to defend the battlefield series by comparing MAG to what you believe is a 'bad' game (CoD), and in turn putting MAG down. God knows though, maybe you just don't think before you post.

 



Comparing MAG beta and BFBC2 actual release i would say neither. They are both sucky games compared to the king of console FPS's.