I've noticed a few threads on the SUPPOSED, Patcher analysis on 3rd parties & Wii,...........................

my question is why?

why is anyone giving Patcher credit for something that has been evident for the past 2 years?

is there anyone on this website, that truly needed an analyst to say that 3rd party developers don't know what to do with the Wii?

everyone should be aware that 3rd party developers did not ready themselves for the Wii because everyone labeled the Wii a failure before it even released.

for which reason it should not be strange and or catch anyone by surprise.

the 2 past years of craptacular shovelware on the Wii should've been enough evidence that 3rd parties were lost in Nintendo land.

Patcher's new name is mudd!

Why not pay attention? He's no better or worse than the lame analysis I can get on these forums, or another site's forums. I pay those nobodies attention when they're right about as often as a broken clock. I might as well extend the same gratitude to the publicized idiot too.

Get over it already.

Pachter.

spelling not important

It is usually the people we disagree with or the people that are a bit over the top we pay the most attention too. People do the same with radio talk shows, Fox News,CNN, MSNBC, etc. Why? Not really sure, but it is fun.

Sure it is... in this case anyway... it completely changes the way you pronounce his name.

Patch-er

Vs

Pac-ter

It's like when I used to call Ogres, Orges.

Same reason people base their entire purchase decisions off of one 'journalists' number review. Most people don't even READ the 'review' they just look at the number and buy or not buy.... People are fools, all of us humans are foolish beings that think we 'know' things when really we know nothing at all. Just be happy and live life, don't worry about the little things like this :)