By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Halo Reach versus Killzone 2 HD screenshot comparison

GodOfWar_3ever on 15 February 2010
Barozi said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:
Barozi said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:
Barozi said:
On a pure visual perspective Killzone 2 still looks better, but on a technical prespective Reach wins easily.

whats the difference ? Seriously, I dont know

The first one appeals to your eye, while the other appeals to your mind.

Well that's at least my philosophical take on that issue :)

umm... KZ2 hasnt been surpassed by any console FPS yet (graphically, and its online is very good too, more tactical unlike Halo's arcadey feel) imo...Halo reach is definitely an improvement over 3..but it isnt the greatest,

Crysis 2 on the other hand is gonna blow our minds...CONFIRMED

and why do you quote me ?

sorry...my mistake..



Around the Network
Jereel Hunter on 15 February 2010

The graphics in Reach's split screen mode blow away those in Killzone 2 - you can't even see players 2-4!

Seriously though, Halo: Reach doesn't need to look as good to be more impressive. The fact is, KZ2 was made for the sole purpose of pushing the graphical bar. Halo games are made to be the best multiplayer shooter experience you'll find. Is Reach likely to beat KZ2 in overall looks? I'd say no (though it's outdoor environments are likely to be more impressiive). Why? Not 360 limitations, but there's only so much you can do when making sure your game can do split screen Coop, or 4 screen multiplayer. Reach will be more impressive, but KZ2 sacrificed these capabilities to offer the highest tier of graphics. Halo Reach won't beat those graphics (probably) but it will be the better game, and sales will reflect that.



JaggedSac on 15 February 2010
Jereel Hunter said:
The graphics in Reach's split screen mode blow away those in Killzone 2 - you can't even see players 2-4!

Seriously though, Halo: Reach doesn't need to look as good to be more impressive. The fact is, KZ2 was made for the sole purpose of pushing the graphical bar. Halo games are made to be the best multiplayer shooter experience you'll find. Is Reach likely to beat KZ2 in overall looks? I'd say no (though it's outdoor environments are likely to be more impressiive). Why? Not 360 limitations, but there's only so much you can do when making sure your game can do split screen Coop, or 4 screen multiplayer. Reach will be more impressive, but KZ2 sacrificed these capabilities to offer the highest tier of graphics. Halo Reach won't beat those graphics (probably) but it will be the better game, and sales will reflect that.

I agree with everything you said.



Andysw on 15 February 2010

Jereel Hunter said:
Not 360 limitations

Sales will reflect that.

The game is going to push the hardware as far as it can handle. Hence the improved graphical visuals of halo reach.

Halo 3 odst isn't better than killzone 2 and yet it sold more.



Killzoned on 15 February 2010

Lets not speak about SAles here, its a Comparison about its graphics

Halo Reach Graphics is not the best i've seen but its beautiful for a Halo Game, it has a lot of Colors in its environment, No doubt the game will look even better when it is released because of its early build
Whereas KZ2 has solid graphics for its hardcore gameplay

So theres really no point in Comparing the games in which they are designed differently but the Leap in graphical level between both game is different because Clearly those Screen shots of KZ2 does not do Justice for its game, Anyone that have played KZ2 in HDMI will understand that the games look way better.



Around the Network
Hisiru on 15 February 2010
Andysw said:

Jereel Hunter said:
Not 360 limitations

Sales will reflect that.

The game is going to push the hardware as far as it can handle. Hence the improved graphical visuals of halo reach.

Halo 3 odst isn't better than killzone 2 and yet it sold more.

Halo 3 ODST is just an expansion.



kunaixhaku on 15 February 2010

w/e killzone 2 is now i think we'll go O.O when killzone 3 is announced in e3



kunaixhaku on 15 February 2010
JaggedSac said:
Jereel Hunter said:
The graphics in Reach's split screen mode blow away those in Killzone 2 - you can't even see players 2-4!

Seriously though, Halo: Reach doesn't need to look as good to be more impressive. The fact is, KZ2 was made for the sole purpose of pushing the graphical bar. Halo games are made to be the best multiplayer shooter experience you'll find. Is Reach likely to beat KZ2 in overall looks? I'd say no (though it's outdoor environments are likely to be more impressiive). Why? Not 360 limitations, but there's only so much you can do when making sure your game can do split screen Coop, or 4 screen multiplayer. Reach will be more impressive, but KZ2 sacrificed these capabilities to offer the highest tier of graphics. Halo Reach won't beat those graphics (probably) but it will be the better game, and sales will reflect that.

I agree with everything you said.

i think and hope killzone 3 will solve that 



homicidaIpanda on 15 February 2010

It official no xbox game will ever look as good to the forum users on vgcharts...why i am not suprised!?

halo screens clearly look better but people get upset cause there blueray player they bought is a year newer and not better.



Jereel Hunter on 15 February 2010
Andysw said:

Jereel Hunter said:
Not 360 limitations

Sales will reflect that.

The game is going to push the hardware as far as it can handle. Hence the improved graphical visuals of halo reach.

Halo 3 odst isn't better than killzone 2 and yet it sold more.

ODST was a continuation of Halo 3 and contained Halo 3's multiplayer... It really just piggybacked on Halo 3's success, which was earned - it's multiplayer gave it a head and shoulders advantage over KZ2.