360 fans theory about fanbase has always been a weak argument. The most they could prove with the evidence they were providing was that more votes went for ps3 games.
You cant prove...
A. what fanbase was voting for them. I own a Wii... and strictly a wii... yet I vote for Ps3 games. Why? Two reasons. 1. because the polls are pointless but its funny to see people put so much stock in them. And when the poll actually interests me (like the one on the front page) MY tastes and MY opinion is what I vote for. I voted for WKC on the front page. Doesn't mean I think its better than ME2 it just means I'm more interested
B. how many unique people were voting for them... easy to grasp really... each day your allowed a new vote. Just because one option has more votes doesn't mean that more people voted for it. On top of each computer being allowed a vote... I could get up to 4 votes a day if I really felt like skewing a poll... But I only have 1 'puter connected to the Internet and I can't be bothered to hook the others up over something so silly.
C. what percentage of voters were of members compared to lurkers... another easy concept... the polls are open to non users also. Even if we ignore every other reason we still would not be able to determine what the member ratio i because of lurkers. Unless there was a way to determine which the lurker to member ratio of votes... which we cant.
D. what % of members of a certain fanbase vote. Who's saying that EVERY single member is voting in these silly polls? Just because a poll is showing favor to a certain side doesn't mean its because every single member voted. EX: each fanbase has 100 members but fanbase A has 60% of their members vote while fanbase B has 30% of theirs vote... obviously the results would look lopsided even though if 100% of each voted it'd be a tie
E. The way people interpret polls. Each person will interpret the polls differently. Like "Who do you think has the better line up in blah blah blah" Just because Halo, Fable, and Gears of War all massive games are going up against Heavy Rain, MAG, and WKC all minor games doesn't mean every ones taste is going to automatically going to go to the more acclaimed games. Ex: Halo is bigger than MAG but Zipper has a cult following. Fable is bigger than WKC but not everyone enjoys WRPGs and Gears of War is bigger than Heavy Rain but some people might not like the roided space marine art direction.
Now quit wining ant talk about games instead of how unfair everything is.