Quantcast
o_O.Q's Wall
o_O.Q

    24,996

    L7: Hunter (10,004 until level 8)
    o_O.Q
    • A -19 year old male gamer
    • United States
    • Joined on May 1st 2011, last online 1 day ago.
    • Profile Views: 24,452
    • Forum posts: 5,632 times which averages 2 posts per day
    • User Reviews: 0 reviews
    •   VG$ 2,190.00

    Badges: (view all)

    Happy Birthday Logged in on your birthday.
    8 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 8 years.
    It's a Start Bank a Total of 2,000 VG$.
    Congratulations on Pressing Start! Score your first game in your collection.
    One Piece at a Time Add your first game to your collection.
    Ride Into the Sunset Managed to avoid being banned for 3 months.
    Vice Free Managed to avoid being banned for 6 months.
    Escape Artist Managed to avoid being banned for 1 month.
    Freezing Logged in on Christmas day.
    Genocide 5,000 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
    Haunted Logged in on Halloween.
    7 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 7 years.
    A Badge Within A Badge Earned 20 badges.
    Harvest Time Logged in at the start of Spring.

    o_O.Q's Wall

    < 1 - 20 of 67 <
    < John2290 posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    You're kind of retarded, right?

    I've always though that calling someone retarded without providing context is the kind of thing a retarded person would do, since they wouldn't understand social interaction.
    So... is there going to be any context?

    on 18 September 2019

    You're eratic and contradictory forum presence of course. You're trolling, yeah?

    on 18 September 2019

    "eratic"
    I have real world responsibilities outside of this website as you do also I hope
    "contradictory"
    Elaborate?

    on 18 September 2019

    Given that you couldn't actually explain your argument properly... does that mean that you're kind of retarded?

    "You're trolling, yeah?"

    How could this be the case when we've had the same position of several issues in the past? Were you trolling then?

    on 21 September 2019

    I'm not on the websitr 24/7.

    Anyway, I just read Angrylittlealchemists comment down here and I think I know what your style is, have you been feigning certain stances to make a point through absurdity? That would explain a lot...

    on 21 September 2019

    Feigning certain stances? Uh my stances throughout my history on this site have all been consistent:

    My last stances were that I think that the idea that what determines a man and a woman is entirely based on "identity" is the stupidest thing I've ever heard

    Before that I stated that I do not believe that Andy Ngo can be shown to be in support of right wing terrorism because there is no evidence that this is the case

    Views that from what I've observed you are in agreement with, what exactly have I posted are you in disagreement with?
    As someone who thinks its fit to call other people retarded I wouldn't think it'd be so difficult for your to articulate your point... but yet here we are

    on 22 September 2019

    < Final-Fan posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    "the tuskegee experiment was a social experiment"

    social experiment means it's socialism ... okay lol

    "funded by taking money from tax payers under the threat of violence" you left the most important part out...

    on 04 November 2018

    Sorry, I wasn't thinking about the fact that you equate taxation (any sort at any level) with socialism. Damn, every country in the world is socialist now ... must be rough for non-socialists.

    on 04 November 2018

    yes socialist programs funded by tax payers are socialist in nature, that you would even attempt to dispute that just shows how deep you've been brain washed
    as i've said previously you need to give up on the notion that socialism is inherently good and only good can come of it... its not only woefully naive but wrong

    on 04 November 2018

    You just told me Tuskegee was socialist BECAUSE it was tax funded ... therefore all tax funded things are socialist. When I point that out, I'm not disputing anything, I'm just highlighting what I see as insanity.

    on 05 November 2018

    ok let me ask you a question, how can socialism go bad? what are some of the negative consequences that can arise out of socialism?

    on 05 November 2018

    I appreciate that you are desperate to change the subject, but I'm not interested. But I'll give you a brief answer: things that are not the Tuskegee experiment.

    on 05 November 2018

    i'm not changing the subject, its that i'm dealing with someone who can't establish the very simple connection between socialism and social programs that harm a community
    i mean what am i supposed to do with someone like that? you tell me... its as i said a completely delusional denial of reality rooted in the idea that only good can come from socialism

    on 06 November 2018

    You said Tuskegee was socialism because it was taxpayer funded.

    on 07 November 2018

    you haven't answered my question, what am i supposed to do with someone who can't establish the very simple connection between socialism and social programs that harm a community?

    if you had answered this question you would have found the answer to your own

    on 08 November 2018

    Your question "what am I supposed to do with someone like that?" is (1) stupid and (2) putting the cart before the horse. And it's also obviously trying to change the subject from why you think the Tuskegee experiment is an example of socialism. So far you've said "it's socialism because it was a social experiment" and then you changed your answer to "it's socialism because it's taxpayer funded". So at that point you're claiming that every form of gov't that collects taxes and does things with that tax money is socialist—thus, every gov't in existence is socialist. When confronted with this elementary school level logical deduction, THAT MOMENT is when you asked me your question and when I don't follow you on your topic derailment I'm the one doing the dodging according to you. You're not fooling anyone but yourself, and I actually doubt you're even fooling yourself.

    Why does the Tuskegee experiment being taxpayer funded make it socialism? You said this fact was the "most important part".

    on 08 November 2018

    " So far you've said "it's socialism because it was a social experiment""
    i never said that i always said that it was the result of socialism because it was funded through theft under threat of violence(taxation)

    " So at that point you're claiming that every form of gov't that collects taxes and does things with that tax money is socialist‚€"
    no every government has socialist elements, but its the degree to which the government controls resources that determines whether its socialist or not

    a car that is red but has black stripes is considered a red car... how dumb would you have to be to not understand this?

    "When confronted with this elementary school level logical deduction, THAT MOMENT is when you asked me your question "
    leaving aside the fact that you are wrong to begin with, i wouldn't trust your deduction skills anyway... here you are fighting for socialism when you don't even understand what it is and assume stupidly(from what i have observed) that nothing negative can come from it

    "Why does the Tuskegee experiment being taxpayer funded make it socialism?"
    socialism in practical terms is reallocation of the resources of a community by its government and can result in both good and bad for a community

    how dumb would you have to be to think that all government reallocation of resources results in good for a community as you appear to believe?

    on a scale of 1 to 10?

    on 12 November 2018

    "socialism in practical terms is reallocation of the resources of a community by its government and can result in both good and bad for a community"
    Literally everything every government does is using (i.e. reallocating) resources collected from communities. Therefore, according to your definition, everything every government does is 100% socialist (except for when it shrinks, which is only partially socialist—still reallocating what is left). How is that a useful definition of socialism?

    But yes. Under your condition that "taxpayer funded" ipso facto is "socialist", I would agree that by that definition the Tuskegee experiment was a socialist program. Just like the police and the army and the national highway system and corporate subsidies. Any and all government activity is socialist. By that definition.

    And I further admit that you never explicitly said Tuskegee was socialist "because it was a social experiment." You said it was socialist because it was a taxpayer funded socialist experiment and (as you said) the second part was the key factor in your mind. You got me for real on that one, fair and square.

    And by the definition of socialism as "including (but not necessarily limited to) everything taxpayer funded" then I'm sure we can agree on plenty of obvious things governments have done wrong over the course of world history (which are necessarily socialism) including but not limited to the Tuskegee experiment. Although I would argue that the basic concept of government, in general, is not to blame for specific misdeeds of various governments such as that. (And therefore the same could perhaps be said of socialism.)

    on 12 November 2018

    correction, "taxpayer funded socialist experiment" was a mistype of "taxpayer funded social experiment"

    on 13 November 2018

    Let me give you some advice: You aren't clever. Everyone can see through your "let me post something ridiculous and act seriously about it so that I can make a point against them democraps" threads. Get better material.

    the funny thing is that i don't think i've made a single post about democrats... what i've posted about recently was socialism and rape culture

    so i suppose that you are making the case that the demonrats are trying to push socialism and the idea of rape culture

    its interesting that you would make that distinction

    " You aren't clever."

    what makes you say that?

    on 14 October 2018

    < KLAMarine posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    What's with that guy in your avatar? His pants are sagging like crazy!

    < Oneeee-Chan!!! posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    (◎_◎)

    hey

    on 09 April 2018

    < spurgeonryan posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    An avatar? I do not feel like you have ever had an avatar.

    i did before

    on 30 January 2018

    < OhNoYouDont posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    Learn what intrinsic means yet?

    waste is intrinsic to the nature of technology... why continue to make yourself look like a jackass?

    on 28 January 2018

    *waste* is a categorization of something. I don't think you understand what you're talking about, fool. What is your level of education?

    Suppose we're talking about computers. You might categorize metal as waste but metal is just a raw material. You have to take another leap to suggest that it's waste.

    on 08 February 2018

    21 years old. Nevermind, you haven't even completed a degree yet. No wonder you're intellectually stunted.
    RIP

    on 08 February 2018

    computers emit waste in the form of heat and sound... that's why we put heat sinks and fans in them dumbass

    there is no technology that exists that does not produce waste that's why waste is an inherent aspect of technology... if you can list an example you'd have a point... but of course you can't

    lol this is funny keep it coming

    btw you think i'm minus 21 years old?

    on 09 February 2018

    I would've guessed about 13, but -21 might represent how many IQ points I'd have to drop to be able to understand how retarded you are.

    You're using the terms byproduct and waste interchangeably, it's known as an equivocation fallacy.

    Feel free to look it up kiddo.

    on 11 February 2018

    "You're using the terms byproduct and waste interchangeably, it's known as an equivocation fallacy."

    no... i quite specifically said "waste" because its waste that i'm talking about

    to reiterate, no technology exists that does not create waste, for the second time, if you disagree then give me one example

    this started out pretty funny but i mean i figured you'd have either accepted you are wrong or moved on by now...
    i think that when i have time i'll make a thread on this

    on 12 February 2018

    Again what is your level of education? This is becoming alarming at this point how insanely illogical you are.

    on 12 February 2018

    lmao i'm going to ask for a third time, list just one example of technology that does not produce waste

    that you are calling me asking you to validate your assertion illogical, is the icing on the cake lmao

    its almost as bad as you not knowing that computers produce waste... it shows such a fundamental lack of understanding of how computers work... and yet here you are on the internet lol

    i'm still trying to wrap my head around that... its like you don't understand that sound energy, light energy, heat energy etc are considered waste depending on the context.... its like you think that waste can only be physical objects... is that true?

    on 12 February 2018

    So no credentials at all then?

    Why am I not surprised...

    Listen kid, I'm gonna help you out here. Technology itself isn't a machine, it isn't a system, it isn't anything that produces waste. What you're hopelessly focused on is APPLICATIONS of technology.

    I can't make it any clearer for you. Good luck finishing middle school.

    on 13 February 2018

    "What you're hopelessly focused on is APPLICATIONS of technology."

    lmao technology is inherently about application

    its about applying knowledge to the world to develop solutions to problems generally through machines

    what in the fuck are you on about lol? you have to be one of the most protracted cases of pride being an individual's downfall i have ever seen and that is saying something

    i can't believe we are at the point now where you are demonstrating that you don't even understand what "technology" means

    on 14 February 2018

    btw i'm still waiting for an example of some type of technology that does not produce waste

    on 14 February 2018

    So you've been wrong about literally everything thus far so let's revisit your initial reply to me.

    "but science produces technology right? and technology has been harmful to the planet and people, that was my point"

    Your claim is that technology is detrimental to mankind, which is hilariously stupid.

    Even if we take your "arguments" (lawl) at their best, you're only arguing that technology can cause some waste. Unless your want to argue that waste is sufficient to cause a net detrimental impact (e.g. outweighs the positives) then you have no case.

    I would argue the waste argument stands in obsolescence just like your education.

    Poor Timmy, no credentials, no supporting meritorious arguments, frolicking along on a fool's errand.

    Again, good luck completing middle school clown.

    LOL

    on 14 February 2018

    "So you've been wrong about literally everything thus far"
    can you provide an example?
    did you not just claim that computers do not produce waste
    that technology is not about application
    that waste is not inherent to technology etc etc etc?

    "Your claim is that technology is detrimental to mankind, which is hilariously stupid. "
    to a simple minded moron maybe... to someone who isn't ruled by black and white thinking like a child its easy to understand that something can be both beneficial and harmful at the same time

    that you don't understand this ridiculously simple concept is not surprising to me given what you've posted so far... but it is quite sad

    "Even if we take your "arguments" (lawl) at their best, you're only arguing that technology can cause some waste. Unless your want to argue that waste is sufficient to cause a net detrimental impact"

    https://media.giphy.com/media/Vg0JstydL8HCg/giphy.gif

    do you believe in the proposition that it is man that is responsible for accelerated rates of global warming we are experiencing? if you do why would you write such a stupid post?

    and are you now conceding that you were wrong and that waste is indeed an intrinsic part of technology?

    you mean you couldn't just use your brain and look at the diagrams i gave you repeatedly weeks ago? dumbass

    on 14 February 2018

    Detrimental waste is not the same as mere waste you mental midget. LOL

    Any system not working at 100% efficiency has *waste*. That's a non-starter, just like your ability to understand simple facts.

    No, you're confused about intrinsic / extrinsic (again). If I build a system and the OUTPUT is waste, that's EXTRINSIC not INTRINSIC. This is trivial, you assclown. Why can't you understand?

    Global warming? ROFL

    We're done here, I don't even know where to begin addressing such asshattery.

    ROFL good thing you're a child.

    on 15 February 2018

    "No, you're confused about intrinsic / extrinsic "

    i'm not... you're a prideful moron that can't admit that he's wrong... you've dug this hole so deep now that you're going past bedrock and into magma

    you're actually now trying to argue that the waste associated with technology isn't always detrimental

    "Detrimental waste is not the same as mere waste "

    just how stupid are you to try to make that argument?

    but ok lets take this to its logical conclusion, can you provide one example of technological waste that is not detrimental?

    and i'm glad that you've conceded that waste is intrinsic to the nature of technology btw...

    "Any system not working at 100% efficiency has *waste*"

    it only took you like 20 exchanges but we've finally reached there... but i suppose its just sad that you've decided now to move onto an even more stupid course of argumentation

    but lets see where this eventually goes, it'll be funny for me regardless

    on 16 February 2018

    LOOOOOOOOL

    on 17 February 2018

    yeah... i'm not surprised that's all you have now, so to recap...

    you didn't know that all technology inherently produces waste
    you didn't know that computers produce waste
    you didn't know that technology at the core is about application
    you claimed that technological waste isn't always detrimental

    and yet you throughout this discussion have been calling me dumb and touting your superiority constantly...

    i mean i'd attempt to give you some advice on how to be more rational, but you're a lost cause... devoured by the monster that is pride

    anyway yeah... this has been a good discussion my man, i think i might make a thread on it when i have time, thank you

    on 18 February 2018

    http://www.dictionary.com/browse/intrinsic

    Your own words betray you "my dude". You claimed that computers produce heat as waste. Heat is great, I'm using my mining machine to heat my entire second floor this winter. How you can argue that all, or even the majority of technological waste is detrimental is beyond me. Then again I'm not an idiot so there's that.

    You go ahead and make that thread so everybody can witness this fuckery firsthand. I'll grab the popcorn.

    on 18 February 2018

    "Heat is great, I'm using my mining machine to heat my entire second floor this winter. How you can argue that all, or even the majority of technological waste is detrimental is beyond me. "

    good to see that you finally decided to list an example... its a stupid one but at least you actually managed to list one at long last

    mining machines routinely overheat during their operation... can you guess why?

    btw do you have any other examples?

    on 19 February 2018

    < Mr Puggsly posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    Hey, I just wanted to respond to this but the thread got locked. "this is actually one area where i think feminists have a point, its her body so let her do whatever she wants with it whether that be self-destructive or not if it doesn't impede her ability to do whatever work she's doing for a company why should it be an issue?"



    Not all feminists support prostitution. Some think women should do whatever they want and others feel it exploits women.



    While it didn't impede her ability to work, its still illegal and frankly its not something like Nintendo wants to be associated with. I mean you can't have the girl sucking dicks on the side for money pushing your Mario games. There's just a conflict there.

    fair enough i just don't think it should be illegal but as you are saying the reality is that it is

    on 11 April 2016

    < Zappykins posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    Thanks for the friend add!

    you're welcome

    on 01 June 2015

    < Proxy-Pie posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    Ugh, poor Syria...

    < spurgeonryan posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    RIP robin Williams! He was great as the AFrican American in Tropic Thunder.

    i think that was robert downey jr actually but yeah R.I.P.

    on 17 August 2014

    < Kaizar posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    About your comment about how black people are the best at sports & music & being educated, well they do absorb more radiation from the sun then any other race, so it only makes sense they would be soo naturally talented at everything across the board in comparison to us non-black people.



    I call this thing in biology; The Superman Effect.



    Think of black people as earth's Kryptonians.

    well honestly i wasn't being entirely serious with that comment actually but that's an interesting theory regardless

    on 14 August 2014

    < Kaizar posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    Best Movies of 2014 Thread:



    http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=173039



    Trailers are in the 4th & 5th OP.



    And please sign my Petition:

    http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/to-convert-kingsman-the-secret-serive-movie

    < Nintentacle posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    Pretty interesting username!

    thanks bro right back at you

    on 22 June 2014

    < Gnac posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    I love keyboard porn. Please send me a picture of your keyboard. I am especially interested in how shiny your , . and ! keys are.

    Barf!

    on 30 June 2014

    < RareglovE posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    Thats one ugly man, no offense to your avatar.

    lol i find him amusing

    on 21 June 2013

    < Ayb posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    Hello friend,I will like to have a privet discussion with you, if you don't mind can you write me back with my privet/personal email (ahok.kwajelukare(@)(yahoo.)co.uk), so i can send you more of my photos and tell you about myself.I'm Ahok by name.

    < tbone51 posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    End the WiiU+Vita Doomed threads!

    http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=157842

    < ps3-sales! posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    LOL you copied riderz avatar.

    lol no i found this

    but yeah they both use the same pic as a base i think

    on 16 February 2013

    Just messin' with ya.

    on 16 February 2013

    < MARCUSDJACKSON posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    hey i fig'd you may have wanted to check these out







    http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=151514&page=1#







    http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=151512&page=1#







    http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=151337&page=1#



    0 minutes ago | 0 comments

    thx man

    on 17 December 2012

    any time mate

    on 17 December 2012

    < 1 - 20 of 67 <

    Currently Playing

    Started on 15 January 2018

    Started on 15 January 2018

    Started on 31 May 2012

    Game Stats

    • 7 total number of games
    • 0 games in common
    • 8.6 average game rating
    • PS3 favourite console (4 games)
    • Action favourite genre (4 games)
    • 0% of games completed