Quantcast
o_O.Q's Profile
o_O.Q

    25,005

    L7: Hunter (9,995 until level 8)
    o_O.Q
    • A -19 year old male gamer
    • United States
    • Joined on May 1st 2011, last online 9 hours ago.
    • Profile Views: 24,666
    • Forum posts: 5,632 times which averages 2 posts per day
    • User Reviews: 0 reviews
    •   VG$ 2,190.00

    Badges: (view all)

    Happy Birthday Logged in on your birthday.
    8 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 8 years.
    It's a Start Bank a Total of 2,000 VG$.
    Congratulations on Pressing Start! Score your first game in your collection.
    One Piece at a Time Add your first game to your collection.
    Ride Into the Sunset Managed to avoid being banned for 3 months.
    Vice Free Managed to avoid being banned for 6 months.
    Escape Artist Managed to avoid being banned for 1 month.
    Freezing Logged in on Christmas day.
    Genocide 5,000 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
    Haunted Logged in on Halloween.
    7 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 7 years.
    A Badge Within A Badge Earned 20 badges.
    Harvest Time Logged in at the start of Spring.

    Recent Wall Posts

    View more
    < John2290 posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    You're kind of retarded, right?

    I've always though that calling someone retarded without providing context is the kind of thing a retarded person would do, since they wouldn't understand social interaction.
    So... is there going to be any context?

    on 18 September 2019

    You're eratic and contradictory forum presence of course. You're trolling, yeah?

    on 18 September 2019

    "eratic"
    I have real world responsibilities outside of this website as you do also I hope
    "contradictory"
    Elaborate?

    on 18 September 2019

    Given that you couldn't actually explain your argument properly... does that mean that you're kind of retarded?

    "You're trolling, yeah?"

    How could this be the case when we've had the same position of several issues in the past? Were you trolling then?

    on 21 September 2019

    I'm not on the websitr 24/7.

    Anyway, I just read Angrylittlealchemists comment down here and I think I know what your style is, have you been feigning certain stances to make a point through absurdity? That would explain a lot...

    on 21 September 2019

    Feigning certain stances? Uh my stances throughout my history on this site have all been consistent:

    My last stances were that I think that the idea that what determines a man and a woman is entirely based on "identity" is the stupidest thing I've ever heard

    Before that I stated that I do not believe that Andy Ngo can be shown to be in support of right wing terrorism because there is no evidence that this is the case

    Views that from what I've observed you are in agreement with, what exactly have I posted are you in disagreement with?
    As someone who thinks its fit to call other people retarded I wouldn't think it'd be so difficult for your to articulate your point... but yet here we are

    on 22 September 2019

    < Final-Fan posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    "the tuskegee experiment was a social experiment"

    social experiment means it's socialism ... okay lol

    "funded by taking money from tax payers under the threat of violence" you left the most important part out...

    on 04 November 2018

    Sorry, I wasn't thinking about the fact that you equate taxation (any sort at any level) with socialism. Damn, every country in the world is socialist now ... must be rough for non-socialists.

    on 04 November 2018

    yes socialist programs funded by tax payers are socialist in nature, that you would even attempt to dispute that just shows how deep you've been brain washed
    as i've said previously you need to give up on the notion that socialism is inherently good and only good can come of it... its not only woefully naive but wrong

    on 04 November 2018

    You just told me Tuskegee was socialist BECAUSE it was tax funded ... therefore all tax funded things are socialist. When I point that out, I'm not disputing anything, I'm just highlighting what I see as insanity.

    on 05 November 2018

    ok let me ask you a question, how can socialism go bad? what are some of the negative consequences that can arise out of socialism?

    on 05 November 2018

    I appreciate that you are desperate to change the subject, but I'm not interested. But I'll give you a brief answer: things that are not the Tuskegee experiment.

    on 05 November 2018

    i'm not changing the subject, its that i'm dealing with someone who can't establish the very simple connection between socialism and social programs that harm a community
    i mean what am i supposed to do with someone like that? you tell me... its as i said a completely delusional denial of reality rooted in the idea that only good can come from socialism

    on 06 November 2018

    You said Tuskegee was socialism because it was taxpayer funded.

    on 07 November 2018

    you haven't answered my question, what am i supposed to do with someone who can't establish the very simple connection between socialism and social programs that harm a community?

    if you had answered this question you would have found the answer to your own

    on 08 November 2018

    Your question "what am I supposed to do with someone like that?" is (1) stupid and (2) putting the cart before the horse. And it's also obviously trying to change the subject from why you think the Tuskegee experiment is an example of socialism. So far you've said "it's socialism because it was a social experiment" and then you changed your answer to "it's socialism because it's taxpayer funded". So at that point you're claiming that every form of gov't that collects taxes and does things with that tax money is socialist—thus, every gov't in existence is socialist. When confronted with this elementary school level logical deduction, THAT MOMENT is when you asked me your question and when I don't follow you on your topic derailment I'm the one doing the dodging according to you. You're not fooling anyone but yourself, and I actually doubt you're even fooling yourself.

    Why does the Tuskegee experiment being taxpayer funded make it socialism? You said this fact was the "most important part".

    on 08 November 2018

    " So far you've said "it's socialism because it was a social experiment""
    i never said that i always said that it was the result of socialism because it was funded through theft under threat of violence(taxation)

    " So at that point you're claiming that every form of gov't that collects taxes and does things with that tax money is socialist‚€"
    no every government has socialist elements, but its the degree to which the government controls resources that determines whether its socialist or not

    a car that is red but has black stripes is considered a red car... how dumb would you have to be to not understand this?

    "When confronted with this elementary school level logical deduction, THAT MOMENT is when you asked me your question "
    leaving aside the fact that you are wrong to begin with, i wouldn't trust your deduction skills anyway... here you are fighting for socialism when you don't even understand what it is and assume stupidly(from what i have observed) that nothing negative can come from it

    "Why does the Tuskegee experiment being taxpayer funded make it socialism?"
    socialism in practical terms is reallocation of the resources of a community by its government and can result in both good and bad for a community

    how dumb would you have to be to think that all government reallocation of resources results in good for a community as you appear to believe?

    on a scale of 1 to 10?

    on 12 November 2018

    "socialism in practical terms is reallocation of the resources of a community by its government and can result in both good and bad for a community"
    Literally everything every government does is using (i.e. reallocating) resources collected from communities. Therefore, according to your definition, everything every government does is 100% socialist (except for when it shrinks, which is only partially socialist—still reallocating what is left). How is that a useful definition of socialism?

    But yes. Under your condition that "taxpayer funded" ipso facto is "socialist", I would agree that by that definition the Tuskegee experiment was a socialist program. Just like the police and the army and the national highway system and corporate subsidies. Any and all government activity is socialist. By that definition.

    And I further admit that you never explicitly said Tuskegee was socialist "because it was a social experiment." You said it was socialist because it was a taxpayer funded socialist experiment and (as you said) the second part was the key factor in your mind. You got me for real on that one, fair and square.

    And by the definition of socialism as "including (but not necessarily limited to) everything taxpayer funded" then I'm sure we can agree on plenty of obvious things governments have done wrong over the course of world history (which are necessarily socialism) including but not limited to the Tuskegee experiment. Although I would argue that the basic concept of government, in general, is not to blame for specific misdeeds of various governments such as that. (And therefore the same could perhaps be said of socialism.)

    on 12 November 2018

    correction, "taxpayer funded socialist experiment" was a mistype of "taxpayer funded social experiment"

    on 13 November 2018

    Let me give you some advice: You aren't clever. Everyone can see through your "let me post something ridiculous and act seriously about it so that I can make a point against them democraps" threads. Get better material.

    the funny thing is that i don't think i've made a single post about democrats... what i've posted about recently was socialism and rape culture

    so i suppose that you are making the case that the demonrats are trying to push socialism and the idea of rape culture

    its interesting that you would make that distinction

    " You aren't clever."

    what makes you say that?

    on 14 October 2018

    < KLAMarine posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    What's with that guy in your avatar? His pants are sagging like crazy!

    < Oneeee-Chan!!! posted something on o_O.Q's wall:

    (◎_◎)

    hey

    on 09 April 2018

    Recent Activity

    View more

    Favourite Games

    View all games

    This list only shows a selection of games from this user's favourite games.

    Recent Forum Posts

    View more
    Write 94

    What do you think should be done about climate change?

    in General Discussion on 08 October 2019

    how many of you drive cars? ...

    Write 79

    Brie Larson teasing possible Star Wars involvement?

    in Movies Discussion on 05 October 2019

    Jaicee said: o_O.Q said: You do understand of course jaicee, that this idea that there needs to be more equal or even 50/50 percent distribution across media and other areas is what intersectionality is based on Now you could argue that you are only for intersectionality where it applies to women under certain contexts such as representation in media, but other people are going...

    Write 79

    Brie Larson teasing possible Star Wars involvement?

    in Movies Discussion on 05 October 2019

    Jaicee said: Lonely_Dolphin said: Why would you believe that's what I'm saying given the context rather than the obvious "gender/race of characters are irrelevant?" It's really not so hard to believe that people who don't like something you do can have legitimate reasons for not liking it, that they're not all just blind mob haters. Like I could just say everyone who likes the...

    Biography

    Height: 5'8

    Eye colour: Green

    Hair colour: Brown

    Zodiac sign: Aries

    Relationship status: Divorced

    Currently Playing

    Started on 15 January 2018

    Started on 15 January 2018

    Started on 31 May 2012

    Game Stats

    • 7 total number of games
    • 0 games in common
    • 8.6 average game rating
    • PS3 favourite console (4 games)
    • Action favourite genre (4 games)
    • 0% of games completed