Quantcast
OhNoYouDont's Activity
OhNoYouDont

    510

    L2: Peon (490 until level 3)
    OhNoYouDont
    • A 89 year old male gamer
    • Joined on July 3rd 2017, last online on 04 November 2019.
    • Profile Views: 1,254
    • Forum posts: 157 times which averages 0 posts per day
    • User Reviews: 0 reviews
    •   VG$ 1,300.00

    Badges: (view all)

    A Free Man Managed to avoid being banned for 2 years.
    2 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 2 years.
    Breaking Out Managed to avoid being banned for 1 year.
    Ride Into the Sunset Managed to avoid being banned for 3 months.
    Vice Free Managed to avoid being banned for 6 months.
    Escape Artist Managed to avoid being banned for 1 month.
    Open For Business Earned 10 badges.
    Haunted Logged in on Halloween.
    Leaving Limbo 100 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
    1st Birthday Has been a VGChartz member for over 1 year.
    Mighty Heart Logged in on Valentine's Day.
    So You Came Back For More, Huh? Logged in a second time.
    'Ello Princess! Awarded for signing up.

    Activity

    < 1 - 2 of 2 <
    • x
      < OhNoYouDont posted something on Lonely_Dolphin's wall

      I was really only saying that some person should not be your sole reason for living. They can be a reason, but shouldn't be the only one.

      x
      I know, I've been asking why.

      on 24 August 2018

      x
      Because if that person is no longer in your life e.g. they die or leave you that puts you in a mental state where suicide seems like a good option since you have nothing to live for anymore.

      on 25 August 2018

      x
      Sure but I don't see how the alternative in having no reason to live to begin with is better. Also friends and family is generally more than a single person, and you can always add more.

      on 26 August 2018

    • x
      < OhNoYouDont posted something on o_O.Q's wall

      Learn what intrinsic means yet?

      x
      waste is intrinsic to the nature of technology... why continue to make yourself look like a jackass?

      on 28 January 2018

      x
      *waste* is a categorization of something. I don't think you understand what you're talking about, fool. What is your level of education?

      Suppose we're talking about computers. You might categorize metal as waste but metal is just a raw material. You have to take another leap to suggest that it's waste.

      on 08 February 2018

      x
      21 years old. Nevermind, you haven't even completed a degree yet. No wonder you're intellectually stunted.
      RIP

      on 08 February 2018

      x
      computers emit waste in the form of heat and sound... that's why we put heat sinks and fans in them dumbass

      there is no technology that exists that does not produce waste that's why waste is an inherent aspect of technology... if you can list an example you'd have a point... but of course you can't

      lol this is funny keep it coming

      btw you think i'm minus 21 years old?

      on 09 February 2018

      x
      I would've guessed about 13, but -21 might represent how many IQ points I'd have to drop to be able to understand how retarded you are.

      You're using the terms byproduct and waste interchangeably, it's known as an equivocation fallacy.

      Feel free to look it up kiddo.

      on 11 February 2018

      x
      "You're using the terms byproduct and waste interchangeably, it's known as an equivocation fallacy."

      no... i quite specifically said "waste" because its waste that i'm talking about

      to reiterate, no technology exists that does not create waste, for the second time, if you disagree then give me one example

      this started out pretty funny but i mean i figured you'd have either accepted you are wrong or moved on by now...
      i think that when i have time i'll make a thread on this

      on 12 February 2018

      x
      Again what is your level of education? This is becoming alarming at this point how insanely illogical you are.

      on 12 February 2018

      x
      lmao i'm going to ask for a third time, list just one example of technology that does not produce waste

      that you are calling me asking you to validate your assertion illogical, is the icing on the cake lmao

      its almost as bad as you not knowing that computers produce waste... it shows such a fundamental lack of understanding of how computers work... and yet here you are on the internet lol

      i'm still trying to wrap my head around that... its like you don't understand that sound energy, light energy, heat energy etc are considered waste depending on the context.... its like you think that waste can only be physical objects... is that true?

      on 12 February 2018

      x
      So no credentials at all then?

      Why am I not surprised...

      Listen kid, I'm gonna help you out here. Technology itself isn't a machine, it isn't a system, it isn't anything that produces waste. What you're hopelessly focused on is APPLICATIONS of technology.

      I can't make it any clearer for you. Good luck finishing middle school.

      on 13 February 2018

      x
      "What you're hopelessly focused on is APPLICATIONS of technology."

      lmao technology is inherently about application

      its about applying knowledge to the world to develop solutions to problems generally through machines

      what in the fuck are you on about lol? you have to be one of the most protracted cases of pride being an individual's downfall i have ever seen and that is saying something

      i can't believe we are at the point now where you are demonstrating that you don't even understand what "technology" means

      on 14 February 2018

      x
      btw i'm still waiting for an example of some type of technology that does not produce waste

      on 14 February 2018

      x
      So you've been wrong about literally everything thus far so let's revisit your initial reply to me.

      "but science produces technology right? and technology has been harmful to the planet and people, that was my point"

      Your claim is that technology is detrimental to mankind, which is hilariously stupid.

      Even if we take your "arguments" (lawl) at their best, you're only arguing that technology can cause some waste. Unless your want to argue that waste is sufficient to cause a net detrimental impact (e.g. outweighs the positives) then you have no case.

      I would argue the waste argument stands in obsolescence just like your education.

      Poor Timmy, no credentials, no supporting meritorious arguments, frolicking along on a fool's errand.

      Again, good luck completing middle school clown.

      LOL

      on 14 February 2018

      x
      "So you've been wrong about literally everything thus far"
      can you provide an example?
      did you not just claim that computers do not produce waste
      that technology is not about application
      that waste is not inherent to technology etc etc etc?

      "Your claim is that technology is detrimental to mankind, which is hilariously stupid. "
      to a simple minded moron maybe... to someone who isn't ruled by black and white thinking like a child its easy to understand that something can be both beneficial and harmful at the same time

      that you don't understand this ridiculously simple concept is not surprising to me given what you've posted so far... but it is quite sad

      "Even if we take your "arguments" (lawl) at their best, you're only arguing that technology can cause some waste. Unless your want to argue that waste is sufficient to cause a net detrimental impact"

      media.giphy.com/media/Vg0JstydL8HCg/giphy.gif" target="_blank" class="link">https://media.giphy.com/media/Vg0JstydL8HCg/giphy.gif

      do you believe in the proposition that it is man that is responsible for accelerated rates of global warming we are experiencing? if you do why would you write such a stupid post?

      and are you now conceding that you were wrong and that waste is indeed an intrinsic part of technology?

      you mean you couldn't just use your brain and look at the diagrams i gave you repeatedly weeks ago? dumbass

      on 14 February 2018

      x
      Detrimental waste is not the same as mere waste you mental midget. LOL

      Any system not working at 100% efficiency has *waste*. That's a non-starter, just like your ability to understand simple facts.

      No, you're confused about intrinsic / extrinsic (again). If I build a system and the OUTPUT is waste, that's EXTRINSIC not INTRINSIC. This is trivial, you assclown. Why can't you understand?

      Global warming? ROFL

      We're done here, I don't even know where to begin addressing such asshattery.

      ROFL good thing you're a child.

      on 15 February 2018

      x
      "No, you're confused about intrinsic / extrinsic "

      i'm not... you're a prideful moron that can't admit that he's wrong... you've dug this hole so deep now that you're going past bedrock and into magma

      you're actually now trying to argue that the waste associated with technology isn't always detrimental

      "Detrimental waste is not the same as mere waste "

      just how stupid are you to try to make that argument?

      but ok lets take this to its logical conclusion, can you provide one example of technological waste that is not detrimental?

      and i'm glad that you've conceded that waste is intrinsic to the nature of technology btw...

      "Any system not working at 100% efficiency has *waste*"

      it only took you like 20 exchanges but we've finally reached there... but i suppose its just sad that you've decided now to move onto an even more stupid course of argumentation

      but lets see where this eventually goes, it'll be funny for me regardless

      on 16 February 2018

      x
      LOOOOOOOOL

      on 17 February 2018

      x
      yeah... i'm not surprised that's all you have now, so to recap...

      you didn't know that all technology inherently produces waste
      you didn't know that computers produce waste
      you didn't know that technology at the core is about application
      you claimed that technological waste isn't always detrimental

      and yet you throughout this discussion have been calling me dumb and touting your superiority constantly...

      i mean i'd attempt to give you some advice on how to be more rational, but you're a lost cause... devoured by the monster that is pride

      anyway yeah... this has been a good discussion my man, i think i might make a thread on it when i have time, thank you

      on 18 February 2018

      x
      www.dictionary.com/browse/intrinsic" target="_blank" class="link">http://www.dictionary.com/browse/intrinsic

      Your own words betray you "my dude". You claimed that computers produce heat as waste. Heat is great, I'm using my mining machine to heat my entire second floor this winter. How you can argue that all, or even the majority of technological waste is detrimental is beyond me. Then again I'm not an idiot so there's that.

      You go ahead and make that thread so everybody can witness this fuckery firsthand. I'll grab the popcorn.

      on 18 February 2018

      x
      "Heat is great, I'm using my mining machine to heat my entire second floor this winter. How you can argue that all, or even the majority of technological waste is detrimental is beyond me. "

      good to see that you finally decided to list an example... its a stupid one but at least you actually managed to list one at long last

      mining machines routinely overheat during their operation... can you guess why?

      btw do you have any other examples?

      on 19 February 2018

    < 1 - 2 of 2 <

    Game Stats

    OhNoYouDont hasn't added any games yet!