| ssj12 said: actually Sony is the one who should be 50/50 between casual and hardcore. Look at the games on the PSN for example. fl0w, Flower, Super StarDust HD, High Velocity Bowling, the PixelJunk series, Pain, Elefunk, etc. Even on the direct console you have HOME, SingStar, Buzz, and LBP. Sony, and formally Nintendo, are the kings of multi-genre games that fit both casual and hardcore. Nini might have fallen to releasing a hardcore bone every once in a while but Sony has show that it has enough developers making both types of games that the can encompass the entire gaming audience. |
Very Well said, the OP, while I agree with what he said, really left out the entire PSN section of the presentation showing off a massive selection of "casual" games. If I would pick one console that is trying to be something ot everyone its the PS3, while the 360 is maybe about 70/30 hardcore to casual, and Nintendo just showed 100% games that people that watch E3 or read the reports from E3 wont care about.
Meh, their choice.
I own all three current consoles and a great gaming rig, now thats out of the way.
This space Reserved for the Nuggets of Wisdom dropped by Bladeforce:
"Why post something like this when all it will get is PS3 owners blinded to reality replying? BOTH THE PS3 AND BLUE-RAY WILL NOT LAST 3 YEARS! TECHNOLOGY CHANGED TOO FAST!"
"is it Wii FIt that has sold as many as PS3's sold? Thats a LOL Look at the total sales of software is it just me that sees Nintendo titles hitting 10m+ and you say they arent making a difference? Another LOL!"
"Hell, with all the negative hype Sony spin, people just aren't interested cost is too high and to get the true HD experience (1080p, 7.1 surround) you will need a $1000+ system. THAT IS GOING TO DO IT IN A RECESSION! PS4 will not happen"
