By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
eva01beserk said:
sales2099 said:

“Not even trying”...so overall we all can admit that neither company makes the most use at launch. Making the entire argument against Xbox null and void. Thank you. 

Maybe they would have been better cross gen if Sony spent less time “pushing the consoles ability” (lol) and focus more on quality control. Perspectives work both ways  ;)

To you is null and void as you refuse to accept anything painting Xbox in the slightest bad light.

What we can admit is that at the beginning devs are still getting used to the hardware. They might not even know themselves what tricks they can pull off. Or how to get around certain inconveniences. Or if something works good some improvements and make it great. But at the moment they are using what they have at the fullest.

For thouse using pc as a metric. Consider the bios updates on cards. Still the same cards but what ever update they manufacture did tends to remove glitches, increases performance and what ever else. Games already made are already done can't do much but games in development will make better use of the new tools provided. So at both points in time devs where using the most of the hardware .

Consider when the xbox one freed up one of the CPU cores recerved for background operations. Games after that where better at no fault of the devs. 

Nice deflection without actually countering the point ;) It’s less defending Xbox being in a bad light and more combating PS fan smugness. Fyi 

For all that talking you still came to the same conclusion: both Sony and MS can’t make 100% use of a system at launch. Your argument about Xbox cross gen still null and void. 

Last edited by sales2099 - on 12 February 2020

Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles.