By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NightlyPoe said:
DonFerrari said:

If we look at software shipment during the start of new gen the valleys haven't been that deep because the 3rd parties will mostly be doing crossgen.

When you say "it's competitors" that isn't PS5, either you are talking only about direct competitors in which case it would have none or you talk about all.

Is there a reason why you're trying to twist my words instead of addressing the point?

Am I the one twisting your words or where you that twisted it from the start?

"continue to outsell its competitors" when it isn't currently and when you wanted to say while it outsells the SW of PS5/XSX are two different things.

And addressed your correction. We already had several transitions from gen to gen and the drop on SW sales haven't been that harsh, so even though on the first couple months PS5+XSX will be below 10M the publishers will still launch their flagship on PS4/X1 and will have the crossgen version on PS5/XSX as have been the case before, within like 2 calendar years or effectively on 3rd holiday those will be solely on PS5/XSX.

The games on Switch will still be the same type currently, indies and low spec 3rd party with the unusual odd port of some AAA current gen game.

We have no indication that with Switch at let's say 70M versus PS5/XSX at 0M GTAVI would launch on Switch instead or even together with PS5/XSX.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."