By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
DarthMetalliCube said:

My bad.. It's actually 20%. I retract 30% of it XD

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/russia-scandal-is-real-involves-hillary-clinton/

I'm going to offer you a second chance to back up your statement or retract it.   You're a good participant in here.  Your not a S***** and I don't want to have to tear that link down.  I'd rather you looked into it again on your own and learned the real details than right here in front of everyone.  The-pi-guy already gave you a great place to start.  Keep in mind that even Fox has had to admit they were wrong on this (except Hannity...that guy will take lies to the grave with him).

As for the David Duke / Gabbard endorsement...can we just stop with treating this like a valid endorsement?  It's so full of bullshit my nitrate sensor broke. The SOLE purpose of this endorsement is being played out right here in this thread.  Division, discord and all around trolling for the LOLZ.

If the 20% supply specifically has been thoroughly debunked then fair enough I stand corrected. Not really in the mood to do a research project rn as I've been writing for like 7 hours today haha. Maybe I'm hearing from outdated info as I haven't really kept up on the Hillary stuff since 2016. But there are certainly other connections when it comes to Russian dealings, Uranium One, and the Clinton Foundation that are seemingly completely verified. Not that I really care - just calling out the hypocrisy and the irony of the politician accusing others of what she and her husband are seemingly guilty of in one form or another:

https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/apr/26/peter-schweizer/fact-checking-clinton-cash-author-claim-about-bill/

I must say though I can't help but wonder why is the Hillary connection is called out and in need of backing up (when there does seem to be some evidence), meanwhile a number of people here have called Gabbard a "Russian plant" or whatever with less than *zero* proof yet these apparently don't need backing up?

Anyway: Noticed the Bern man finally gave his support for Tulsi on twitter. I knew I still liked this guy! Probably still a third choice for me after Yang but definitely moved up in my book. We now have out of the candidates - Bernie, Marriane, Yang, and even Beto (who I don't care for but respect the statement), in addition to Nina Turner speaking in support of Gabbard. Safe to say this smear backfired in Hillary's face ha. 



 

"We hold these truths to be self-evident - all men and women created by the, go-you know.. you know the thing!" - Joe Biden