The US Politics |OT|

[EricHiggin]

the-pi-guy said:
Second whistle blower

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/10/06/politics/second-whistleblower-trump-ukraine/index.html?utm_source=CNN-News-Alerts&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Lawyer+for+Ukraine+whistleblower+says+he+represents+second+whistleblower+on+Trump&r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2Fpolitics%2Fcomments%2Fde3ger%2Fmegathread_second_whistleblower_comes_forward_in%2F&rm=1

the-pi-guy said:

EricHiggin said:

Second accuser

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/26/politics/who-is-deborah-ramirez/index.html

Third accuser

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/26/politics/julie-swetnick-allegation-kavanaugh/index.html

Fourth...

They'll run out of fingers eventually, and then they won't be able to deny it!

Meaningless post.  

1.)  You're making assumptions of the validity of these claims against Kavanaugh.  

The facts are that neither of us knows what is the for sure actual truth.  Every one is going to point out what they consider evidence that proves or disproves the claim, but the fact is no one knows for sure.  

Using the unknown as evidence or comparisons doesn't work.

2.)  You're implying that there's a similarity between these claims and the whistle blower claims.  

Difference is, Trump broke the law on television. 

Where did I make assumptions other than more evidence tends to lead to more people believing something?

I think you mean the difference is Trump broke the world and everything about it the second he was conceived.

I also think you missed a few, or more, differences, but hey, why bother when you can go straight to the 'Trump card'?