I kicked intel to the curb, I'm a Ryzen boi now.

[Pemalite]

fatslob-:O said:

Pemalite said:

It's not Ancedotal. I am not going to list all 230~ monitors from Newegg. (Verses 4x for 1280x720.)
But you are more than free to look it up yourself if you think I am lieing.

1366x768 is generally regarded as "720P class" resolution, which is represented in the Steam statistics that I provided prior.

The ~230 monitors pale in comparison to the thousands of other options out there that aren't 720p ... 

I didn't claim that you're lying but I am saying that you're statements thus far aren't representative of the gaming population ... 

768p is a common laptop resolution but it's not a common desktop resolution which makes it irrelevant for our purposes of trying to compare desktop CPUs ... 

Errrr... Did you miss the part where I stated that 720P panels used to be more popular in the low-end than they are today? Steam statistics does not reflect the current hardware being sold on shelves, it reflects all hardwar that has been sold and currently in use irrespective of era.

Honestly thought you would have understood that.

768P used to be a common desktop resolution in low end TN panels. - The fact that there are hundreds of 768 panels currently on sale on newegg USA is exactly reinforcing that particular idea.

fatslob-:O said:

Pemalite said:

I never stated that AMD didn't have the highest graphics performance out of all integrated graphics? So no evidence necessary.

You aren't paying attention to the benchmarks, AMD's higher integrated graphics performance in those cases actually translates to higher gaming performance ...

Intel's higher CPU performance on the other hand isn't ...

Not in all CPU bound scenarios at 720P.

fatslob-:O said:

Pemalite said:

An absolutely irrelevant argument. Their choice isn't our business, they still made it.

Their choice also isn't relevant to high-end gaming benchmarks so their making a compromise anyway ... (even Intel has compromise options so the CPU performance of APUs isn't anything special) 

And yet... They still going to make that choice and yet... They are still consumers... And yet, the benchmarks presented will be palatable to such a demographic.

fatslob-:O said:

Pemalite said:

Nah. For the reasons I alluded to prior. An extra datapoint isn't a bad thing.

An extra datapoint doesn't necessarily mean it's a useful datapoint ... 

See above. Clearly it use useful to some. Just because it's not useful to you, doesn't mean it's not useful to others.