I kicked intel to the curb, I'm a Ryzen boi now.

[fatslob-:O]

Pemalite said:

It's not Ancedotal. I am not going to list all 230~ monitors from Newegg. (Verses 4x for 1280x720.)
But you are more than free to look it up yourself if you think I am lieing.

1366x768 is generally regarded as "720P class" resolution, which is represented in the Steam statistics that I provided prior.

The ~230 monitors pale in comparison to the thousands of other options out there that aren't 720p ... 

I didn't claim that you're lying but I am saying that you're statements thus far aren't representative of the gaming population ... 

768p is a common laptop resolution but it's not a common desktop resolution which makes it irrelevant for our purposes of trying to compare desktop CPUs ... 

Pemalite said:

I never stated that AMD didn't have the highest graphics performance out of all integrated graphics? So no evidence necessary.

You aren't paying attention to the benchmarks, AMD's higher integrated graphics performance in those cases actually translates to higher gaming performance ...

Intel's higher CPU performance on the other hand isn't ... 

Pemalite said:

An absolutely irrelevant argument. Their choice isn't our business, they still made it.

Their choice also isn't relevant to high-end gaming benchmarks so their making a compromise anyway ... (even Intel has compromise options so the CPU performance of APUs isn't anything special) 

Pemalite said:

Nah. For the reasons I alluded to prior. An extra datapoint isn't a bad thing.

An extra datapoint doesn't necessarily mean it's a useful datapoint ...