By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
o_O.Q said:

"They would need to support some degree of collective ownership, not necessarily complete."

why don't you want complete collective ownership and how would you decide who is allowed to own a business?

"You definitely cannot be left wing if you think it is fine that the working class should pay for the financial crisis and not wall street."

I don't think you could argue that it was right wing either since the right is about less government intervention, but I definitely agree that those businesses should have failed

Obama was a piece of shit for doing that and murdering millions of people and destroying their countries and running guns to mexico etc etc etc

I won't rule out complete collective ownership as a functional way to make a state, but it is not my prefered society.

Some collective ownership does not mean that you have to take anybody's right to own a business. And even if the state should own a full sector, anybody can make a business in another sector.

"the right is about less government intervention", not true, Libertarians (and anarcho capitalist) are against governmental intervention. Lots of right wingers are are for governmental intervention, including the guy in your profile picture. And governmental intervention is fine, it is corporate welfare I have a problem with, which democrats and republicans have been pushing the past half century.

Doing better than Obama is an easy job, somehow Trump manages to do even worse.