Radek said:
I thought you were aware there's going to be downgrades to get PS4 games running on the Switch? That's the reason Capcom, EA, Ubisoft, Activision, Rockstar and others don't do it, because first you have to downgrade the resolution and graphics and then you have to make a decent port, and some developers are just too lazy to do that. This game wasn't meant with Switch in mind, it was meant to push big consoles and PC as far as they could (at the time) that's why it might be more blurry than say Zelda or Dragon Quest XI. |
All those games that run on PC also had downgrades to run in PS4.
I'm plenty satisfied with what I get on PS4 and seem that most Switch owners here are satisfied with what they get.
So yes I would play the best version I can get, but seems like for quite a bunch being able to play portable is the best version.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."