pitzy272 said:
I personally disagree. Spider-Man 1 was undoubtedly a good game, but IMO it was not on the level of “stellar” or “amazing.” I think the fact that it’s a Spider-Man game created a tendency for people to like it more and give it more passes for its shortcomings.
I’m a PlayStation fan, but come on, do you have to bash the competition to celebrate the good news for PS? |
My personal opinion and the critical acclaim put it on the same level of stellar games. But we don't need to discuss that. I agree there is potential to improve now that they are first party.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."