By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bofferbrauer2 said:
the-pi-guy said:
>Yang and Gabbard are far-right darlings (most of their supporters have voted Trump over Clinton at 5:1 and 12:1 rates respectively, according to YouGov) polling at 0% with the democratic mainstream, so I wouldn't lump them together with the other progressives. Besides, Yang lost votes in the data I posted.

That's very interesting for Yang. I've heard that conservatives like the idea of replacing welfare with UBI, but it's different to actually see a little data showing that support.

Neo-Nazi groups hope that Gabbards stance in support of arabic countries would mean that she's against Israel and Jews in general, hence why those support her. Trump may be a white nationalist, but when it comes to Israel, he's in full support of it. So he's not an option for them this time around despite in everything else he's so often on their wavelength.

Arabic countries aren't exactly anti-Israel anymore, they have all but abandonned the Palestinian cause, and many of them hate Palestinians (especially in Jordan where they are resentful of them, there is a significant anti-Rania faction). It is primarily the Persians who Israel has most conflict with. As well, Trump is a massive supporter of Arabic nations, giving Saudi-Arabia tens of billions in weaponry.

Being pro-Arabic isn't exactly something I would associate with neo-Nazism. But if they support her over sheer ignorance, then there isn't really a problem. Although, a pro-Arabic stance is pretty status quo at this point.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.