RolStoppable said:
I doubt it. $100 extra for home console functionality comes across as good value with Switch Lite as a reference point, plus sales of the original Switch have increased this year on a global basis. Conversely, a $250 original Switch would make the $200 Switch Lite look less attractive. EDIT: The long-running rumor about Switch revisions was about a smaller, cheaper version and a modest upgrade to the original Switch, for the latter it was pointed out that it won't be something like the Pro was for the PS4. It's likely that this modest upgrade replaces the original Switch (which is going to be phased out) and occupies the same $300 price point. |
That is because Switch was overpriced from the beggining.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
