| LudicrousSpeed said: 1: In the case of DR3, because Capcom said the game was never going to happen without Microsoft. In the case of SFV, Capcom said it would have taken a long time without Sony. Not to mention you're talking about a pretty small time franchise versus Street Fighter. One franchise Capcom was going to let die without Microsoft support, the other you'd have to be an apologist to actually believe would have never happened had Sony not gotten involved. Personal taste also plays a part in this. You won't see me complaining about Shenmue 3 exclusive stuff because frankly I don't give a shit about the game. 2: Titanfall is different and I've said on this forum numerous times that I wish PS4 users could have played it. But in that games case Microsoft was already heavily invested and EA struck a deal. If they made Jedi whatever Xbone exclusive I would also say that's a bum deal and PS4 owners should get to play it. 3: Who are "you guys" exactly? I'm expressing my own opinion here. |
1: Dude. Both Street Fighter V and Dead Rising 3 were moneyhats. Both are "shitty practices" (your words) regardless of your personal taste.
2: "But in that games case Microsoft was already heavily invested and EA struck a deal." I don't even know what you're trying to say. How is it different from "But in SFV's case Sony was already heavily invested and Capcom struck a deal."?
3: For instance the user below. First comment of the thread (besides OP).
| VAMatt said: That's unfortunate. Anti-gamer behavior like this needs to see more pushback. So, I'll put this as a check mark in XB's favor when trying to decide which next gen console to buy first. |
