By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheMisterManGuy said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
What you describe as the Capcom 5 and what question you ask at the end are two very different things. One was a very specific deal in a particular time period as a way to release games for a more understated console - which ended up backfiring, and one is just asking if they should make new IPs. Not really the same thing, especially considering the Capcom 5 included Resident Evil 4, though it was focused on original IPs mostly. So I'm not sure why the idea has to be in regards to the Capcom 5? Doesn't really make sense.

But yeah, new IPs would be cool, more major companies need to focus on brand new properties.

It's not just new IP I'm asking for. But new IP that are unique and different from everything on the market. Capcom 5 was exactly that. Fresh, unique concepts many developers wouldn't have touched with a ten foot pole. Something like that, but on modern platforms and smaller budgets than the AAA stuff would be nice to see.

Yeah but, Resident Evil 4. 

And the Capcom 5 was defined in large part by being exclusive, meaning to sell Gamecube hardware, and the game set being 5. 

I don't really think just needing to make new IP means any of those things inherently. It doesn't even need to be 5 games necessarily, like you said, just a couple or so new IPs would be great. 

Could have just asked why not make unique new IP in that case. 

I get what you're going for though and I'd love to see that happen.