By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
curl-6 said:

If you find me condescending, fair enough; you are entitled to that opinion.

But if an argument is logically deficient, I'm going to point it out as such. Arguments are not a protected species exempt from criticism.

Attacking an argument is totally fine, and you do that with another argument and data, without any need to classify the argument because that doesn't have any value in the end.

It is equivalent to me saying your argument is dumb thus you are wrong. That doesn't prove anything, while your reasoning of why the argument was wrong were much better.

If an argument is illogical, then I will point out that it is illogical, and use evidence and examples to demonstrate why it is illogical, which is exactly what I did.

If you have a problem with that, then, sorry to come off as rude, but that's your problem, not mine.