By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Machiavellian on 17 April 2019
Edit Thread
EricHiggin said:
Machiavellian said:

So is that picture suppose to represent Trump high standards for hiring staff.  Lol, you make this to easy.  Its like playing with a child in their early troll stage.  Once challenge they run out of ideals and resort to nonsense.

So you are saying you have no clue about the DK effect.  Just as I thought, all mouth no action.  When tasked to prove your words you come up short, thanks for playing.  Try better to troll next time.

You asked for proof of high standards. I showed not one but two. How many do you specifically require? Will I get a bone if I show more? Why would you assume If he has standards that high when it comes to those types of things, that his standards for the people that work for him would be much lower? How do you think he paid for all that gold and bling, which likely also helped get him that woman? Lazy, useless, good for nothing staff? That's the formula for success alright!

No, I'm saying I'm not a dog and your not the master and we're not playing fetch. You brought up the DK effect, and were quite certain Trump falls under it, and I simply pointed out don't be so sure, since the effect itself points out exactly that. If you're so sure someone else falls into it, then quite possibly, you yourself may very well fall into it as well, if not worse. Maybe, maybe not.

Since I pointed this out already, and instead of proving your words, you simply tried to put the onus on me.... Hmm...

At BOLDED: If you are going to call someone either direct or on the sly ignorant of a subject then yes, the onus is on you to prove your point.  If you cannot then just shut up.  Either you have proof that you understand the topic or you do not.  So far with your answers, the only thing you did was waffle.  So again, if I am ignorant of the DK effect then either prove your words of shut up about it.  

As to the 2 pieces of proof you posted, are you saying a picture of a room is somehow a standard on how Trump hires someone personally for a cabinet position.  That somehow this gaudy room is the standard we should look at for his ability to hire qualified people to important staff position.  I am sorry, I just do not get it.  How does 2 pictures of a room mean anything about Trump ability to hire qualified people to high level staff position.  Should we be asking his personal decorator how they hire people instead of Trump.