No, they are not anti-consumer. In fact they are very pro-consumer. Most of times you'll get a better game for the same pricetag because a platform holder poured money on the game to promote their platform even accepting not to get the money back on that specific game. So you'll have more investment and caring for the game.
There are so many games that doesn't matter which of the 4 platform (PC, PS4, X1, Switch) you have you will have enough quality game to play out that the few exclusives won't jeopardize your enjoyment of gaming. It is much more people that love to complain about everything being entitled to play the game they want on the platform they want paying how much they want being pissed when some of these aren't met.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
