Jumpin said:
(Homer Simpson voice) Mmmmmmmmm... grey paste pumped with nutrients.... But honestly, I highly doubt that would occur. But we would certainly do a lot better if we ran society far more efficiently: not just in food production, but also in energy production. The lack of efficiency we currently have is largely due to a lack of appreciation and respect for our planet and its limitations. In my lifetime, I have seen what can only be a catastrophic decline in wildlife throughout the world (60% since 1970, which indicates that the amount of wildlife is probably about half of what it was at the time of my birth). A large reason for this is the rapid expansion of the livestock industry, which has nearly quadrupled worldwide since 1970; deforestation has led to a tremendous decrease in the planet's capability at repairing its atmosphere. Regardless of how we evolved, it is a long time since we could be considered part of the natural world (for the most of us). Natural selection no longer governs us as a species due to our social constructs and culture - we mostly don't eat natural foods sources any longer (the vast majority of meat in grocery stores is from domesticated animals which are unnatural, even the majority of fruit and vegetables are domesticated crops). We are doing heavy damage to the world, and the leading culprit is the livestock industry which has done more damage to lands and damage to the air we breath and fresh water supplies than any other factor in the world today. Part of the issue is farming is that it takes away the horror in how "meat" is made, it's the flesh of an animal that has been slaughtered - instead of hunting down and killing an animal, you just spend 5-30 minutes in an office somewhere crunching numbers, writing reports, or meeting with clients and other colleagues - completely disconnected from their food than one with nothing but a fishing rod and a hunting knife (even a gun makes things way easier and less connected than it perhaps should be) - most people don't want to kill an animal, it's not a natural instinct - instead society has set up this very cowardly system that we call the livestock and meat industry. Anyway, that's my thought on the unnatural connection we have with what we eat, as a people. I don't buy for a moment that vilifying meat eating is counter-productive, almost all rapid social change has occurred as a result of the vilification of the undesired trait: absolute monarchies, slavery, fascism, racial segregation, fur, ozone depleting chemicals, wife beating, homophobia (and that is fairly recent), child labour, etc... And yes, some people will be furious, even violently opposed, but it has worked. And I very much admire what the vegan community has done (I wouldn't call them militant, because that implies military action) - the recent vilification of meat by vegan groups has curved the growth of the animal products industry and on a per capita basis we now eat less meat as a species than we did just a few years ago - the percentage of vegans has drastically increased throughout Europe and other Westernized nations. It's obvious there is a positive impact; and like most major movements, people are going to be insulted and have their feelings hurt - but it's all irrelevant in the end since this is the right thing to do to help repair the damage we have done to the planet (yes I have been playing Final Fantasy 7 lately!). Also, nothing wrong with a little dose of toxic masculinity =D |
20 years ago nobody gave a shit about vegans. Thanks to their anti-meat campaigns they managed to build up a front against them that is stronger than ever. We've come from tolerating vegans to hating them. How is that not counter productive? I mean how do you befriend people and make them interested in your cause? Do you A: Talk about how cool your stuff is or do you B: Call them assholes for the things they like and blaming them for all the problems in this world?
From how you talk I see that you mostly come from an ethical standpoint, which is another terrible approach. Ethics are by definition arbitrary and subjective and won't sway anyone who has different ethics. They are the main point where anti-vegans can pin you down because ethics are just arbitrary rules you made up yourself. You can't tell someone to care about animals and the environment when that person just doesn't care and especially when you draw arbitrary lines between what's worthy of protection and what is not. It makes you look like a hypocrite, further hurting your cause. Like how you condone the notion of masculinity even though in our current understanding masculinity is very much a very anti-vegan disposition.
Just get your message straight and don't try to appeal to arbitrary and subjective values that others will never understand anyway. I, personally, have nothing against veganism and I probably wouldn't care to live on a vegan diet if I didn't have to go out of my way for it. I'm sure the majority of people are like that. But instead of appealing to them, certain vegans just can't stop poking a hornet nest with their "holier than thou" attitude.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.