Miyamotoo said:
We talking about RDR2, and RDR2 was in development for 7-8 years. The Last Guardian is totally different story because game was developed for PS3 and than game is moved to PS4. |
TLG was in development since at least 2007, so much before PS4 was know. RDR2 was in development since 2010, many years before PS4 or Switch was know as well. That didn't prevent neither from showing in PS4.
The reason for RDR2 not showing in Switch have nothing to do with how many years ago it started development, It is purely to the power of Switch (and perhaps sales potential for the game) and that engines aren't infinitely scalable. RDR2 certainly could be made to run on Switch, even on PS3 and X360. But that would mean redo the game and axe much of it.
And considering how many other AAA games doesn't get released on Switch it is certainly verifiable that time it started development is merely an excuse when the console is almost 2 years in the market, even more when we had devs and users here saying how easy to port Switch is.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."