By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
iceland said:
@donferrari

3 games =/= most and only one of those was released by a MS studio at the time of release, sales is a bit tricky considering gamepass and that digital is higher on Xbox, but we’ve seen SoT have pretty good success. But I’m not here to defend MS’s past work this gen (as it was pretty bad). I’m simply stating that Crackdown 3 is literally the last game to generate a cause of concern regarding MS going into next gen as for the points I have previously mentioned. I was also worried about MS’s first party but they recently did a huge overhaul, and it’s time to see if it improves next gen or not. A game that was started by the old head of Xbox and was stuck in development hell by a 3rd party studio has no telling in that. Literally all I was saying

Well besides Forza I wouldn't say MS had any real great output this gen at all, so it isn't just 3 games even if they are the most recent.

Anyway, let's see what they will have for next gen when that happens.

The Last Guardian was struck on development for 2 gens, started somewhere before PS3 releasing and released a lot after PS4 release, and we had several changes of management in Sony since.

If the game was bad because of the previous manager, then current manager shouldn't keep it. He had no issue caning other games.

And all in all, 60 is a very low grade for a game that took this much money, time and hype by MS.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."