By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ArchangelMadzz said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

Actually your point is wrong. Had your point simply been "oh, the Switch hasn't been out for two years", you would have been correct. But that was just a supporting point you were making. What you were actually trying to get across with your comparison was that the PS4 got it's first official price cut when it had been out for two years, and that the Switch has not even been out for two years, so Mandalore's comparison is flawed because you can't say that the Switch is still selling at it's original price as a supporting point for the console when it hasn't even been out as long as the PS4 was when it got it's first price cut.

But this isn't correct. The Switch has already gone on longer than the PS4 did when it got it's first price cut. Unless you were making a different objection with the 2nd half of your comment to Mandalore's, what that objection could be I can't figure out in the slightest. At this point you should agree with Mandalore's overall point, the only thing he really got wrong was saying that the PS4 up to this point had two official price cuts, but that was only half of your reply.

Hope you get what I mean. 

Seeing as we're nitpicking, you'd have a point if this chart was for the first 23 months. But it's for the fist 22 months. Both consoles hadn't had an official price cut within 22 months of launch.

What you just said wasn't a nitpick though? It's just moving goalposts. Mandalore said the Switch is still selling. Even if Mandalore was only talking about the chart, you are very clearly talking about now. You would have stated otherwise had that been the case, and you yourself even compared the point the Switch is at now in it's life to the point the PS4 was at on it's 24th month (though that comparison was wrong), so that was clearly never the set frame of time.

I only replied to you because you asked me what it was that you said that wasn't correct. You didn't seem to get my point, so I reiterated. No need to take it that way, man.