Quantcast
View Post
potato_hamster said:
DonFerrari said:

Being good or acceptable would be totally subjective, so if the customer base think it's good we may disagree but it's true to them. Even more when they accept and say it is much lower than PS4/X1. If they said it is great, perfect or cover most AAA games then we could put it as wrong.

Don, all of this is subjective. We're literally postulating about what a potential consumer would need to push them into buying a Switch. If this was a known, quantifiable thing, most of the conversations on this message board about sales would be completely unnecessary.

On this point I would have to agree that very few people are waiting for ports or multiplats from A grade to buy Switch.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994