No, that's what a history is for.
If the one time offense is minor and from a long time ago, that shouldn't be taken into account for future progressive bans anyways.
If a user needs a new warning to remind them for a similar offense from 4 years ago, then they should get a new warning. The result would be the same regardless if said user had a warning in their history or not.
The history gives context. If you can pick and choose which infractions are considered for removal, that can open a new can of worms
NintenDomination [May 2015 - July 2017]
- Official VGChartz Tutorial Thread -
NintenDomination [2015/05/19 - 2017/07/02]
Here lies the hidden threads.
| |
Nintendo Metascore | Official NintenDomination | VGC Tutorial Thread
| Best and Worst of Miiverse | Manga Discussion Thead |
[3DS] Winter Playtimes [Wii U]
