Have the reasons changed since the last time this popped up lol?
|Chris Hu said:
There is zero evidence that he existed there are no first person accounts of any of his actions while he was alive.
Even if there would be first person accounts, there was the Indian guy Shirdi Sai Baba with thousands upon thousands of followers who would claim had witnessed miracles performed by him and yet no one is taking those alleged miracles as facts in spite of the personal accounts.
I recommend believers the following exercise: if the same arguments you bring forward for the existence of your god also apply for another claim - that could even contradict the existence of your god as is the case for other gods of other religions - would you recognize that those claims are also true? If your argument is good to say your god is real, then the same argument and alleged "evidence" when applies to something else would also make those other claims real.
The only way to separate falsehoods from truth is to have standards to discriminate between those two things, otherwise everything and anything is real.
Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because: